>>2385771
>Article influenced drop.
>Improper sequence.
?
>>2385771
>Article influenced drop.
>Improper sequence.
?
Agreed for sure. Just a bit confused how an article could influence Q to post out of order. Q knows the order, no?
Not gonna harp on it further but still a valid questions, methinks.
ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE
Not lovin' it.
If I could turn back time..
You Fucking can't!!!
Absoultely agreed.
He issued a retraction, and said not to spread the mistake.
Overreacting twat fucks here are choosing full cover up!
Lame and cowardly.
PS. Acknowledging heated post and calling it a night.
Kek'd and bleachbit'd.