tyb
There’s a reason the latest New York Times hit on RFK Jr. felt strange.
Not just dishonest.
Not just desperate.
But structurally different — more like a psychological operation than a piece of reporting.
People instinctively feel something is “off,” but they can’t always articulate what they’re reacting to.
This essay is that articulation.
For the first time, we are going to map the architecture of narrative warfare — the behind-the-curtain system legacy media uses to shape public perception, control emotional frames, and enforce ideological obedience.
This is not theory.
It’s a playbook.
And it explains exactly why the RFK piece looks the way it does.
https://x.com/MAHA_Action/status/1989528817476550755
—
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1989528817476550755.html
—
The NYT accidentally created a perfect case study:
-
Emotional staging
-
Zero evidence
-
Anonymity
-
Narrative laundering
-
Distributed amplification
-
Character assassination
-
Weaponized melodrama
-
Open rejection of proof
This is the architecture.
This is the blueprint.
This is how legacy media controls perception.
And now that people can see the operating system — they can’t unsee it.