Anonymous ID: 7e6753 Nov. 18, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23868568   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8819 >>8849

Let's keep it simple and break it down. What two reasons might one have for wanting to divide this single group of four hijacked airliners into two groups of two each?

Anonymous ID: 7e6753 Nov. 18, 2025, 4:36 a.m. No.23868859   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9017

>>23868819

>What airliners?

point taken

I am, however, working from the standpoint of debunking the official story. And testing what other possible true scenarios might fit into the facts as presented. So that is where I'm starting from. Looking at the official story, what might make you want to split them into two parts? Spoiler: There are more than two reasons. But at least two should be quite obvious.

Anonymous ID: 7e6753 Nov. 18, 2025, 5:17 a.m. No.23869035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9060 >>9089

>>23868849

Many possible correct answers.

For me.

Just based on the graphic visuals.

Two stayed close by. And two went far west before turning around.

And.

Two took off from same airport, Two did not.

 

Also the latter two. No images of airplanes attacking.

 

I have to divide them into two groups. Likely originating from separate attacking forces. So basically the US government had to invent stories for 77 and 93. Because the truth would set America on a collision course with second attacking force. And they wanted to prevent that at all costs.

 

Dunno because have not checked yet. But. I've a strong inclination to wager that the only hijackers to turn up alive were from Flights 77 and 93.

Anonymous ID: 7e6753 Nov. 18, 2025, 5:21 a.m. No.23869060   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23869035

>No images of airplanes attacking.

Think about it. Everyone and his dog knew about the two airliners in NYC at the time of the Pentagon and Shanksville crashes. But nobody got either one in a photo or video? Seems very very unlikely to me. Because people already knew we were under attack. I know camera hounds. They grab their camera. They go outside. They start looking around.

Anonymous ID: 7e6753 Nov. 18, 2025, 5:30 a.m. No.23869109   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23869089

Clinton bombing the embassy was beyond the pale. A screw up, if not intentional, of epic proportions. If Chinese believed intentional then all bets are off. It's rather stunning to look at the number of US embassy bombings worldwide both before, and after, Belgrade. We grade on a bell curve. How many times did I hear that particular phrase in the years after 9-11? Countless times. Codespeak.