>>23871278 >>23871232 >>23871262
>He is one of the few good ones.
There is a lot of
nice-sounding words.
His conclusion, though,
appears to be that 'the president' (Trump)
won't do the right thing and appoint
FBI/DOJ leadership
that will do the right thing
And I think that's bullshit
And I think most anons here
think that's bullshit
So I'd say he's a low-info investigator
who may have done some good
work investigating
But his forays into
what this all
means at the highest levels
are either
(1) above his pay grade
or (2) there is a carefully-hidden axe to grind
such as
is borne by massie and MTG
In politics,
the answer is nearly always
(2) and not (1)
Now you may assume,
charitably,
that the answer is (1)
but I would pay attention
carefully
to that assumption
>Higgins was a dirty cop, so this tracks.
>C'mon man! He gave cool speeches and said things I agree with. He has to be good.
Yeah I catch your realism