Anonymous ID: fbf082 Aug. 1, 2018, 5:41 a.m. No.2388782   🗄️.is 🔗kun

BO/BVs

>>2355675 >>2351700 >>2349367

I think it's prudent to remind everyone of previous examples where sex has been used as a weapon to divide/conquer. Weimar, Palestine, and here in the states Playboy, Hustler, and the plethora of free content everywhere, and the feminist movements; we should be really familiar with this tactic by now. They use healthy sexual human nature to perverse, and pit us against each other. There's an excellent write up here:

https:// courses2. cit.cornell.edu/sociallaw/student_projects/ObscenityFirstAmendment.htm

 

It's an ongoing debate whether it should even be covered as "Free Speech". A lot of people spout off opinion on it without any real discussion. Many of us have grown up in a culture where it should be considered "normal" to see this type of thing in magazines or the chans, and that's just the way it is. Arguments against nudity or obvious porn shilling –on qresearch– simply state "there's a place for that over there"; pointing to the multitude of boards for every taste/fetish you could possibly imagine on 8ch, 4ch, reddit, and every other porn tube, hub, wire, hamster, etc.

 

"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God", and I'm the last person in the universe to shame someone for partaking in forbidden fruit. Please keep in mind, though, that I'm not making a case for banning nudity, either. The only thing I can do is make the clear case that conflating the issue of "nudity for the sake of nudity" and "Free Speech" has honestly nothing to do with qresearch. However, in that vein of discussion exists many examples of how hypersexuality is used/weaponized against us. A placated populace will drop their defenses as their mind is adverted to self-seeking behaviors.

 

It's never been about Free Speech in the US. It's always been about the slippery slope. Hence, this post:

>>2348970

 

Q has acknowledged the attacks coming to the board. The case is made in the statements above that, even though we can all appreciate a fine pair of boobs without having to "relieve" ourselves, the obvious eventual intent of some anons (the shills, not real anons) is to subvert and cause divide:

>>2349064

 

All I ask is that we keep this mind. Anons that feel the absolute need to post lewds should probably ask themselves this question:

Is this was Q was talking about?

>>2338977

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2338883.html#2338977

2339108

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2338883.html#2339108

 

Just food for thought. Thanks, BO/BVs for everything you all do here. It cannot be said enough!