Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 4:58 a.m. No.23883329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3340 >>3357

>>23883317 (lb)

You make no sense. I'm not the one running a divide and conquer narrative on this board. I'm one of the few willing to stand against these evil bastards and challenge their ideas and narratives and do battle in the sphere of ideas like every bread header has said for getting close to a decade, and now they copy everything I do. If my shit is old and tired then the clowns that post here's shit is completely dead.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 5 a.m. No.23883337   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3341 >>3356

>>23883332

That's all you do though. No you claim that people are copying you because you copy someone else? Seriously, is there anything to you guys now other than behaving like toxic copycats? You're allowed to be yourself here, you know, you don't have to copy someone else.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 5:50 a.m. No.23883436   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3476

I mean, if I didn't consider this a duty they would have ran me off years ago. Due to recent events, it's also an obligation I can't walk away from. Oh well. Let 'em steal all the merit and valor of others to protect themselves and their "hive," they'll just pay for it later.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 5:56 a.m. No.23883445   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3455

Better that they're contained in a benign than dehumanizing meme. It is funny how they claim to be the nickname, and proselytize that everyone's the nickname, because they claim they're the nickname, and copy every meme rotation I post and unique things I've said to do it. And then tried forcing rules of limitation upon me that they don't even follow and claiming it's for my protection. How is that not the typical organized crime excuse? I'm not Him returned, but these shills are the people that He warned about.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 6:36 a.m. No.23883531   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>d3f018

So because I posted that Star Trek clip yesterday you have a fascination with posting Star Trek memes, eh Parakeet? You do realize how you post here is a form of fraud, right? You fuckin' loser. KEK!

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 6:41 a.m. No.23883544   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Really is like a variation of TDS the shills have here, only they focus on one single anon. Gave up their merchants and flawed narratives and copypastas to run around famefagging from the shadow of someone else's reputation. Must have been a real blow to their egos to find out they're not as strong as they thought they were.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 7:16 a.m. No.23883658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3675

>>23883647

I'm not upset at all. You seem to not be able to accurately assess emotion in whom you're talking to, because I can assure you there's no emotion involved right now other than amusement. So, you just deflect and couldn't even answer my question. Later, loser. You outed yourself. Better luck next time. You clowns never stay on topic and try to make the argument about who you're arguing with when you fail.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 7:19 a.m. No.23883668   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3673

>23883650

You know, red text, there's many women in the sea. Move on and find the next one, because there's always a next one and there's always the probability that the next one will be better than the one before.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 7:38 a.m. No.23883728   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3771

KEK. Whatever, red text. Let's say for a second you're telling the truth, which I'm willing to bet most people here know you're not, and you really are heartbroken. You do realize you're displaying the very behavior of why she chose not to be with you anymore, right?

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 7:57 a.m. No.23883793   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3842

>>23883762

> Are they insane or something?

Well, they seem to act like they are. They abandoned pretty much every copypasta and meme they used to post to run around either schizoposting or famefagging from the shadow of someone else's reputation. They never stay on topic and always try to make the argument about emotion that they either inaccurately assess or are trying to provoke. They're just a bunch of washed-up failures riding high on someone else's success and going through the motions until the hammer drops and puts an end to their never-ending bullshit they force upon people.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 8:21 a.m. No.23883889   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23883878

Yeah, that persona's been around for a few years. Was active a lot in 2023 then went quiet and started up again recently. Seems like tt's an act of despair trying to pied pipe the lonely and single with his narrative into a state of depression would be my guess as the motivation behind it. Sympathy seems to be their favorite vector to exploit though.

Anonymous ID: 630b73 Nov. 21, 2025, 9:16 a.m. No.23884080   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23884072

>Ricky Gervais cheapened the Golden Globes โ€“ but worse he overshadowed vital political statements

No he didn't, he shined a lot on its rot. The glamor of giving participation trophies to multi-millionaires for playing make believe was never going to last.