Anonymous ID: 9929d0 Aug. 1, 2018, 6:14 a.m. No.2388981   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9063 >>9070

Previous Bread:

>>2388674

>>2388674

Walnut sauce goes on pasta. Here's a recipe:

https://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/nigella-lawson/pasta-with-walnut-sauce-recipe-1946692

 

Now, aside from actual walnut sauce? Part of the pizzagate theory is that is actually code for creating a sauce with the pineal gland of the human brain. There are certain parts of the body, like the adrenal glands, that when consumed, create a euphoric high. I'm not certain if the pineal gland is a part of that list, or is simply a Hannibal Lector type of deal (outright cannibalism for the sake of cannibalism), but, again; the theory is "walnut sauce" is talking about pineal gland.

 

Q posting it makes it a big deal because we're talking the fringe shit of the pizzagate theory. The fact that someone would even go through the effort of dissecting a child's body/brain to extract very specific parts for human consumption is a real mind blower for some, but I'd like to remind everyone of a particular Dahmer that was known for keeping bodies in his freezer at homeโ€ฆ

 

Q has said it several times. They are sick, and evil. If all these Q coincidences with POTUS are true, then we're in for one hell of a ride going forward. Q was ready to drop pizzagate stuff in direct response to a news article re: Jim Steyer. Though worded carefully as to avoid libel, I take it as to mean that Q has some proof of this sort of behavior.

Anonymous ID: 9929d0 Aug. 1, 2018, 6:25 a.m. No.2389084   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9114 >>9268

>>2389044

>>2389050

Valid points, but think about this.

  1. Start a new thread

  2. Take examples from the source I provided

  3. Post them

  4. Lee Stranahan-types come and wreck the proofs as lacking factual backing (he's done it several times)

  5. Edit the proofs accordingly

 

There's going to be times where anons present something as evidence, and it's going to get smacked down because it simply isn't. Be ready for this. We should welcome others to challenge the proofs anyway. The more solid they are, the more solid the case for Q.

 

As a side note, if someone would just ask the freaking question of the WH/POTUS/Sarah Sanders, the proofs would be inconsequential.

Anonymous ID: 9929d0 Aug. 1, 2018, 6:44 a.m. No.2389256   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9295

>>2389223

>>2389226

^^^^^^^

That's right!

https://www. forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2017/10/25/why-was-obamas-justice-department-silent-on-criminal-activity-by-russias-nuclear-agency/#e3ac37bbe179

 

>A less noted fact is that Uranium One was represented by the Podesta Group from 2011 to 2013 (managed by John Podestaโ€™s brother), which cashiered $180,000 from its client. The Podesta Group had avoided registration as a foreign agent by claiming that a client, the Centre for Modern Ukraine, had no ties to a foreign government. The Centre for Modern Ukraine was likely funded by ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich from the billions he extracted before fleeing Ukraine.

 

Good Job, anons.

Anonymous ID: 9929d0 Aug. 1, 2018, 7:15 a.m. No.2389620   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9636

>>2388895

>>2388895

It's to avoid Libel suit from Jim Steyer. He sues 8ch, and "discovery" leads to 8ch being hosted by DoD. In other words, Q's not quite ready for full disclosure, yet.

 

IN OTHER WORDS:

Sensitive means the info dropped is in relation to ongoing investigations (think sealed indictments). Q got ahead of themselves (erro made). Article influenced drop (someone on Q team decided "FUCK YOU JIM STEYER", watch this!). Since it's all related to ongoing stuff, Q corrected by saying "Slow the roll on that one."

 

All the MSM has to do is ask the stupid question!