>The amount of $, attention, and effort wasted into ruining somebody’s life. Cold blooded and vindictive. Bend all the rules for the fucking maestro. God laughs back.
I've been saying something similar but not in the same words for a few years now.
>The amount of $, attention, and effort wasted into ruining somebody’s life. Cold blooded and vindictive. Bend all the rules for the fucking maestro. God laughs back.
I've been saying something similar but not in the same words for a few years now.
The origin country stuff on X is kind of shocking where a lot of those accounts are coming from.
>It turns out that a bunch of accounts that post about American politics all day aren’t actually American…
Monetization reasons I bet. It's like they're just trying to make a buck off the U.S. The drop "Be careful who you follow" is echoing in my mind right now. I notice quite a few of them are anti-MAGA too.
Like this one, an anti-MAGA profile implying from a Native American yet originating from Bangladesh.
How many of the shills continually fucking with this board and the anons on it are not located in the U.S. then when taking the profile exposure on X into account?
>threatens Zelensky’s image as a tireless defender of Europe
Is that his image? To me it's always been of a cocaine-addicted deep state beggar.
KEK
I'm wondering how they're getting around VPN masking because wouldn't using a VPN when creating an account log the country location of the VPN?
>So many X users seem to be falling for this crap.
Sounds like they need some anon pattern matching skills.
So, uh, is that the new deep state strategy? Hijack MAGA?
Fine. Did you believe an RRN article or something? "lol"
Something smells off about Candace's claim of being targeted for assassination by Macron. Looking for sympathy by claiming being a victim. Wouldn't something like that be like an international incident? Nobody is squawking about it but her.
2 minute transparency updates on Fox news really fucks your brain, doesn't it. You whine.
The Daily Caller is now deciding who ambassadors can have business with? Where do you draw the line? I mean, sure, I understand where they're coming from. Diplomats meet with all kinds of people though, take POTUS Trump's cordial media spot with a communist, and it's not the role of the media to dictate who a diplomat can meet. All sorts of fucky stuff going on right now.
I mean, I don't agree with it personally, but I'm not going to demand he be fired because of a meeting.
Because that's just cancel culture bullshit, and seems an attack on POTUS Trump's administration.
Sure, buddy. It's weird how on X the people that post that narrative to tell people what to think seem to be located in the Middle-East, India, or Asia. Weird, huh? I think it's you, I don't think it's who you try telling everyone it is with a simple-minded, one-track-pony narrative. Might work on the low IQ, but it doesn't work here.
Oh, I'm familiar with their smear and hijacking tactics, at least the online variants of them, SmartDust. Because I am aware of the aspect in the things. Run along now, I'm not interested in your paranoid delusions.
You know, I wouldn't be opposed to country reveals here either. I mean, I'm MAGA, loved the US my whole life, everything that came from the US was always better, but I am a Canadian. Haven't really kept that a secret but it's not something I talk about very often either.
>Was it the unsourced claim she made millions from insider trading, or something else?
The claim made from actual documented sources? The Lockheed Martin stock purchase 2 days before Russia invaded was kind of interesting. Setting her leaving date to still qualify for lifetime congressional benefits is interesting as well. I have nothing against her, I don't even have the full picture as to what is going on regarding this, but I'm quite confident POTUS Trump didn't make his decision about this on a whim.
>Or, maybe she really was a domestic enemy and her visit to The View forced her to be removed?
I wasn't really paying attention to what was going on with her at the time. I thought she was just trying to reach across the aisle and engage in civil discourse with them by going on The View and CNN and whatnot, kind of like Fetterman is doing going on Fox regularly and stuff. Then I saw that Epstein protest thing she attended with signs behind her calling POTUS Trump a pedophile, that wasn't a good look either. Wasn't on my bingo card, that's for damn sure. The Epstein stuff though is getting released, she fought for that, and now she's exiting stage left. Supposed to think about it like watching a movie, right?
IIRC in the drops there was a condition related to the Chandler stuff. If the records become unsealed. Which records?
Yeah, the optics on that were pretty bad.
>The hiding of it could be that it’s not true.
I can think of a reason why things regarding her are being kept quiet. She hung around a lot with celebrities as well.
Charlie's death had nothing to do with her income increasing 3400%, or the optics of standing beside people calling POTUS Trump a pedophile.
>income
net worth
Vati talks all though but the moment the law comes for the sack of shit at a keyboard somewhere responsible for all his fake and fraud, he'll cry like a little girl.
Do you always incorporate Nazi symbology into your memes?