>>23895789
>>23895791
yazzzz!!!!
and…
i wonder what could have been accomplished if we truly had a research board as almost no one seems to know very much really and those who appear to be dialed in… not so much
kek
Jan 14, 2018 2:49:27 PM EST#537
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 000000 No. 22
TRUST SESSIONS.
TG departure [HEC].
NOT to testify.
NOT needed to testify.
Think logically.
NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.
DO NOT chase MISINFO.
What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Who can WE TRUST?
RATS everywhere.
EVIL everywhere.
TRAITORS everywhere.
NO SUCH AGENCY -VITAL.
RAW INTEL -VITAL.
US MIL -VITAL.
SAFE COMMS -VITAL.
YOU, THE PEOPLE -VITAL.
Boards changed due to statements re: private comms - FALSE.
Boards changed due to failure to IDEN accurately.
Boards changed due to MISINFO.
Targeted approach to direct flow of info created.
MESSAGE -VITAL.
CONTROL of MESSAGE -VITAL.
DELIVERY / RECEIPT of MESSAGE -VITAL.
MAJOR players here to distract, create doubt, and alter the direction.
SC: MISINFO everywhere.
SC: MISINFO from past reliable sources.
SC: AXIS OF EVIL can & will return FIRE [is].
SC: Seek immediate [F9-Sx_VB8239].
SC: CONF_y
Q
Jan 19, 2018 12:04:38 AM EST#553
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 000000 No. 37
TheTELL.
How can we listen in, track, and monitor American citizens [bad actors]?
[We hear you].
[We see you].
What must we LEGALLY demonstrate in order to gain such warrants?
FISA?
Do we TRUST theFISAjudges?
MIL INTEL?
State Secrets?
Why is this relevant?
Who can we TRUST?
Expand your thinking.
Q
Apr 15, 2018 8:56:54 PM EDT#1153
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 531a51 No. 1057159
Apr 15, 2018 8:38:40 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: eded94 No. 1056766
>>1056554
>SS/LL deal drop(s) w/ orig timestamp(s).
Q is "SS" correct or a typo? please clarify
>>1056766
Typo.
SC = Supreme Court.
Q
Hang, hang on!
kek
MAGA Fumes at Judge Blocking Trump Deploying National Guard—’Insurrection’
Oct 05, 2025 at 01:10 PM EDT
A federal judge’s decision to block President Donald Trump’s plan to deploy the Oregon National Guard in Portland has set up a high-profile clash over executive power, federalism, and limits on the use of military force in domestic affairs.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut,who was appointed by President Trump in 2019, weighed not only on the legality of sending federalized troops into a U.S. city amid protests, but also on the broader constitutional relationship between the White House, Congress, and the states.
Since the order, multiple MAGA members have come out against the decision, with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller calling the move a "legal insurrection" in a post on X.
"The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge. Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life," Miller continued in his post.
Immergut’s order followed a growing legal and political battle over Trump's use of federal and military responses in Democratic-led cities, highlighting recurring tensions between local autonomy and assertions of presidential authority to restore what Trump described as “law and order.”
The Justice Department, representing the administration, appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals late Saturday.
“President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement — we expect to be vindicated by a higher court,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, according to Reuters.
Why It Matters
Questions about the appropriate balance of civil and military power, as well as the president’s ability to override state officials, remain central as both sides head toward further legal proceedings.
The case follows recent court rulings restricting similar deployments to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., raising the stakes for how future administrations may use federal force domestically.
State sovereignty, the rule of law, and concerns over escalation during protest periods remain at the center of public and legal debate.
https://www.newsweek.com/maga-fumes-at-judge-blocking-trump-deploying-national-guard-insurrection-10830566