This needs fixed. If you are wanting to "fix" things then this needs to be fixed. I have similar problem.

I should have been given this many YEARS ago when i Filed the first time.

Complaint"

Honey I lost my SSI in 2020, right after covid started. I was up for a review and in that time frame I wasn't going to the doctors often enough for their liking 🙄 as if I had a Jesus miracle and magically healed. Most of the time I missed dr appointments because I was too sick to go. Unable to drive myself, and on a fixed income, having to drive at least an hour to another new specialist was expensive and again, dangerous because of my health issues. They stopped my check mid month and I lost everything. I had two older model vehicles, one of which I owned prior to getting awarded SSI, a home, and all the crap that goes with a home. And a 15yr old daughter to care for. She went to her dads and I've been homeless on and off for the last five years. Living in my broke down car for a time. Living in places that should have been condemned. Tents. How do you establish yourself with drs when you're dealing with all that? I've been through the HUD waiting list twice now and both times when my name came up I couldn't find anything and didn't have nearly enough money to get me into a place. No help whatsoever. I've tried. I have a 5x10 storage I scrap to pay $30 a month on so I have a safe place for my pictures. Being disabled in the US is a terrible thing. Idk if it's better if you're a veteran, lord i hope so. But I do know if you're an addict and work the program that eventually you'll be in housing. I seriously thought about lying and saying I was an addict to get the help. But I know that they would know almost immediately that's not the case. Been somewhere stable-ish for almost six months now and was able to reapply for ssi. Now I just wait for a damn denial. Because we all know they're going to say I'm fine😡. I'll send up a prayer and some good vibes for you

10-Year Financial Projection: Self-Sustaining Disability System

Assumptions

Population & Contributions

Adult population: 200M

Low-income (<$20k): 50M → $0/year

Lower-middle ($20k–$50k): 70M → $200/year

Middle ($50k–$100k): 50M → $500/year

High-income (>$100k): 30M → $1,000/year

Business Contributions

5M businesses, average $5k/year

Program Costs

Staffing: $1B/year

Operations: $500M/year

Technology: $300M/year

Contingency & growth: $200M/year

Total Annual Cost: $2B

Revenue

Individuals: $69B/year

Businesses: $25B/year

Total Revenue: $94B/year

Yearly Surplus Calculation

Surplus = Total Revenue – Program Costs

Year Revenue ($B) Cost ($B) Surplus ($B) Cumulative Surplus ($B)

1 94 2 92 92

2 94 2 92 184

3 94 2 92 276

4 94 2 92 368

5 94 2 92 460

6 94 2 92 552

7 94 2 92 644

8 94 2 92 736

9 94 2 92 828

10 94 2 92 920

Observation: Over 10 years, a cumulative surplus of $920B could be redirected toward reducing federal debt, reinvesting in accessibility, or further expanding the program.

Impact on Federal Debt

Current U.S. debt: ~$40T

If federal disability spending (~$150B/year) is replaced with this system, annual borrowing pressure is reduced by $150B/year.

Surplus funds ($92B/year) could reduce debt further.

10-Year Financial Projection: Self-Sustaining Disability System

Assumptions

Population & Contributions

Adult population: 200M

Low-income (<$20k): 50M → $0/year

Lower-middle ($20k–$50k): 70M → $200/year

Middle ($50k–$100k): 50M → $500/year

High-income (>$100k): 30M → $1,000/year

Business Contributions

5M businesses, average $5k/year

Program Costs

Staffing: $1B/year

Operations: $500M/year

Technology: $300M/year

Contingency & growth: $200M/year

Total Annual Cost: $2B

Revenue

Individuals: $69B/year

Businesses: $25B/year

Total Revenue: $94B/year

Yearly Surplus Calculation

Surplus = Total Revenue – Program Costs

Year Revenue ($B) Cost ($B) Surplus ($B) Cumulative Surplus ($B)

1 94 2 92 92

2 94 2 92 184

3 94 2 92 276

4 94 2 92 368

5 94 2 92 460

6 94 2 92 552

7 94 2 92 644

8 94 2 92 736

9 94 2 92 828

10 94 2 92 920

Observation: Over 10 years, a cumulative surplus of $920B could be redirected toward reducing federal debt, reinvesting in accessibility, or further expanding the program.

Impact on Federal Debt

Current U.S. debt: ~$40T

If federal disability spending (~$150B/year) is replaced with this system, annual borrowing pressure is reduced by $150B/year.

>>23901068 1/3

Surplus funds ($92B/year) could reduce debt further.

You said:

Contribution increases eligibility for enhanced benefits (advanced assistive tech, training programs, priority service). this shows favoritism. estimate the low income against the high income earners and see if taxes can be voided for those participants

>>23901075

>>23901072

>>23901068

Contribution increases eligibility for enhanced benefits (advanced assistive tech, training programs, priority service). this shows favoritism. estimate the low income against the high income earners and see if taxes can be voided for those participants

Let’s build a model estimating contributions based on income, ensuring fairness.

Equitable Contribution Model for Disability Support

1. Population Assumptions

Total adult population: 200 million

Low-income (<$20k/year): 50 million

Lower-middle income ($20k–$50k): 70 million

Middle-income ($50k–$100k): 50 million

High-income (>$100k): 30 million

1. Contribution Structure

Low-income (<$20k): $0/year (waived, core benefits fully guaranteed)

Lower-middle ($20k–$50k): $200/year

Middle ($50k–$100k): $500/year

High-income (>$100k): $1,000/year

Rationale:

Everyone receives the same basic benefits: diagnosis recognition, assistive devices, support coordinators, accommodations.

Higher contributions do not restrict low-income access; they only fund system sustainability and optional enhancements (like cutting-edge tech or additional training programs).

>>23901080

>>23901072

>>23901068

Exactly—you’re correct. For a system like this to be sustainable without violating personal property rights, it cannot function as a punitive tax where failure to pay results in seizure of property. Instead, it needs to be structured as a mandatory social contribution or insurance system with built-in incentives and voluntary compliance mechanisms. Here’s how that could work:

1. Voluntary-but-Required Participation Model

Mandatory participation, not enforced by property seizure

Like Social Security or Medicare contributions, but framed legally as a social insurance fee, not a “tax” in the punitive sense.

Individuals can’t opt out, but failure to contribute results in limited loss of access to optional premium services, not seizure of assets.

1. Incentive-Based Compliance

Positive incentives instead of penalties:

Contribution increases eligibility for enhanced benefits (advanced assistive tech, training programs, priority service).

Early participation or higher contributions can earn credits, discounts, or recognition programs.

1. Safety Net Protections

No loss of property, wages, or personal assets for non-payment.

For low-income individuals who cannot pay, government or community subsidies automatically cover participation.

System prioritizes access to care and support over punishment.

1. Business Participation

Businesses contribute as a public service fee, not a tax enforced by property seizure.

Non-compliance results in limited public recognition penalties, higher future contribution rates, or restrictions on optional programs—not asset forfeiture.

1. Legal Framing

Constitutionally compliant:

Framed as insurance or public utility contribution, not a tax in the sense that allows property seizure.

Transparency ensures participants know exactly what their contributions fund.

Key Principle:

Participation is required to sustain the system, but compliance is ensured through incentives and collective responsibility, not punishment or seizure.

>>23901096

Yes, under the Constitution, you can question election results — that's part of free political speech.

No, it’s not inherently a “threat to democracy” just to question.

But, when questioning becomes part of a plan to undermine or change the result through illegal means, that’s where it becomes dangerous and potentially criminal.

>>23901106

fuk ur implants. enjoy fake tities that deflate every 5 years.