hm, methinks i recognize this poster… i've been out of it for quite a while but real glad to see you still here!
>And the only source for that is BO or BVs?
them and the hundreds and thousands of anons who've seen the posts?
it's confusing if you come in late, but not much of an issue - if you can remember previous "mistakes" like trip reveals etc
>From where I sit, everything is suspect. As I am sure all anons understand for themselves.
trudat.
i saw before they were taken off qanon.pub
not any specific shock/new info in there, but a Steyer walnut email and link to Haiti…
at this point, not quite buying the "accidental" part of it, though i could not say yet what is being tested/trialed/evaluated here, but that's likely what's going on - or at the very least, optics
honest question, how was last night so different than other rallys?
why do you find this proof more convincing than, say, the links between Q posts and Trump tweets over past months, etc?
(missed a lot of the rally/past weeks)
the drop itself lays it out: Hussein & HRC
last time i saw, qproofs was incomplete, confused, randomly-ordered and way, way, way below what could be done/collected.
so much work, so much finds, so little memory/organisation to help sort it out…
also it takes time to read the drops. And the drops alone aren't enough, often you need to go further in comments/conversations/the story, and takes even more time and effort.