chick fo' free
Something for Nothing?
The concept of usury has been misunderstood and misrepresented in modern times, diverging from the traditional understanding of the Church's doctrine.
Usury is not just about charging excessive interest, but rather any interest charged on a loan, making it a form of theft.
The traditional view of usury is defended by David Hunt in his book "Something for Nothing?" as a charge for something that does not exist, leading to a form of chattel slavery.
The modern understanding of usury is a distortion of the traditional view, perpetuated by economists and theologians who have misconstrued the issues.
The traditional view of usury is supported by the Church's doctrine, as well as the arguments of St. Thomas Aquinas.
Usury begets a form of chattel slavery, where the borrower is treated as the lender's property.
The Council of Vienne branded usury as sinful.
St. Thomas Aquinas' arguments against usury are presented and clarified by David Hunt.
Modern economists from the late 17th century onward have misconstrued the issues surrounding usury.
David Hunt: author of "Something for Nothing?" who defends the traditional view of usury.
St. Thomas Aquinas: whose arguments against usury are presented and clarified by David Hunt.
The Church: which has consistently taught that usury is a sinful practice.
Modern economists: who have misconstrued the issues surrounding usury and perpetuated a distorted view.
Theologians: who have failed to defend the traditional view of usury and have instead adopted a more modern and erroneous understanding of the concept.
Those who prioritize economic analysis over moral reasoning: who have contributed to the neglect and distortion of the traditional view of usury.