ok, I got one
if they are liberals:
let them eat crow and tell them it's because they are democrats
>>23909331
it's a character in an annoyance and revulsion psyop.
the pretense is that he's a . . . and had relations with . . .
and also that he 'spams the board'
but in fact it seems as though it's just a psyop and no real people are involved.
so it's two sides of the same coin. It floods the bread with revulsion and tries to trigger people as they hit the breads.
just filter any mention of it on either side of the staged conflict.
the goading of someone to break the law is a tactic of the leftists.
they would then say 'oh, look, law breaker Trump'
you do not belong here
the tactic of leftists to suggest a law abiding leader is going to go rouge, but doing it in the form of a question.
you do not belong here!
bad habit pepe,
you are new here aren't you?
how you'd know or not know i have no idea.
obviously you're just trying to cause conflict.
how long I've been here doesn't matter.
and me pointing out the tactic of shills is something that I do from time to time.
you should stop smoking, and promoting it. It's a nasty habit and it makes you seem to be not the much in control, but under the influence.
>(You)
note it has to use the pejorative.
it's part of it's script.
no one when confronted with the name calling would read beyond that.
it wastes it's time trying to conflict monger.