Cops claim you need to ID and ask permission before recording public servants publicly accessible areas of government building.
As Homeland Security has reminded, recording in publicly accessible areas of government (publicly funded) is a constitutionally protected right.
Domestic Enemies, violating rights under color of law daily across the nation.
Midland Police Department Deputy Chief Greg Chatwell bullies citizen journalists recording. Department claims body cam footage is "confidential information" after FOIA request.
Arizona tried setting a minimum distance to record law enforcement of just 8 feet, it was ruled unconstitutional. Other states tried 25 feet, and ruled unconstitutional. Other states keep trying until they can get it to "stick".
The fact of the matter is, as long as people don't physically interfere or threaten, it's not obstruction. Mere presence can not be considered a threat. Our rights are NOT optional and government has ZERO authority to "weigh government interest" against the peoples rights.
>the mentality of a tyrant full of insecurity
Cop looking for a fight, threatens man for free speech on his own porch, threatens to shoot his dogs, and turns off his body cam.
Gotta prove to the world how tough they are… except they're not. They're cowards.
Except I don't. I use my actual IP, hell I've said where I am several times. Everett WA, next to Boeing. There are those here who know my name and have let it be known, doesn't bother me in the slightest. I actually find it funny, and if they looked up my wifes maiden name…. well let's just say it's a hell of a funny coincidence kek.
I stand by what I post, in the light, because I know I do not stand alone.
Notice you NEVER argue against what I've said, only project nonsense.
Hello neighbor.
Stolt
>proof?
Anon, I think you need to re-read the drops and look around. The left wing and the right wing are both controlled by the same mind.
If you wanted to "get ahead of" those who are pissed about law enforcement and the courts violating our constitution, could you make a bunch of dumb college kids cause trouble with an anticop message that never actually called out the real problems?
>"systemic bad cop" hyperbole.
Except it isn't. Government BLATANTLY violates the peoples rights and constitution daily. Law enforcement BLATANTLY violates the peoples rights and constitution daily, and those mythical "good cops" gladly accept the paycheck, ignoring their oath and duty.
Uh… reality? Have you read the constitution?
Gun control, roadside civil asset forfeiture, "furtive movements", prior restraint, people being trespassed from where they have a constitutionally protected right to be for holding their government accountable… these things are happening in violation of the constitution and the peoples rights every day, and ever cop GLADLY accepts the paycheck while ignoring their oath.
Tell me, who told you government gets to "weigh government interest" against the rights government is constitutionally forbidden from infringing upon?
Never attacking the message, always attacking the messenger.