>>23915903 lb
the break?
>>23915901 lb
this is false.
they display their symbols right in our faces. It's obvious. And Q also mentioned it.
Secondly, that the 2 airplanes which were flown into WTC 1 and 2 were actually large ‘drones’ that were remotely controlled by U.S. military personnel. There were no passengers on board those two drones as they were not the same flights referred to in the official 9/11 Commission report. As follows:
^ that part is false
no it was CGI broadcast network involvement. Military took control of major Broadcast networks
Local networks shut down
no kidding it wasn't Russia
the Brits. Also created Israel.
I know there were charges and I think they were a diversion, Easter Egg, for the "conspiracy theorists."
Everybody heard them. The were played over the network footage, broadcast on Tv
I believe the perpetrators wanted people to "connect the dots" falsely, and assume the charges are what took it down.
doubt.
he wasn't
he was a faggot.
They only killed the swishy 'out' gays. The elite NAZI were closeted.
The sex research place was destroyed. It was infighting between the two groups. And the Institute had lots of material on the elite's perverted behavior, including pederasty.
oh right. kekkkkke
You haven't studied enough of these yet.
Is that you Alex?
kekkkk
yes, they took boys into the woods for nature walks.
Ordinary people got suspicious at some point.
Good book, long essay on it called "Pink Swastika"
back in the day everybody knew they were gay, it was a joke.
Was covered up by the pushing of the Gay Right, 1970
Apparently many things changed around that year. So I just learned.
I think Gelli was his daughter.
He was a foster and his alleged half sister, Angela, was not blood related.
Sort of like Hunter. bi-sexual but a faggot and incest pedo?
Or Barry, Faggot but still goes for little girls?
The Royals are all imbred.
Yes, there have been several recent scientific articles and studies (published between 2023 and 2025) examining consanguinity (marriages between close relatives, often leading to inbreeding) in various Arab populations, highlighting its prevalence and associated health risks such as increased genetic disorders, congenital anomalies, and reproductive challenges. These studies typically frame consanguinity as a cultural practice rather than a genetic defect inherent to the population, but they do quantify inbreeding rates and their impacts. Below, I'll summarize key recent examples, focusing on peer-reviewed research.Key Recent StudiesNationwide survey on awareness of consanguinity and genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia (2024): This cross-sectional study, published in Human Genomics, surveyed over 1,000 Saudi residents and found consanguineous marriages (primarily first-cousin unions) account for more than 50% of marriages in the country. It links this to a higher prevalence of genetic diseases like thalassemia and sickle cell anemia, estimating significant healthcare costs (up to $500 million annually for related treatments). The study emphasizes low public awareness as a barrier to reducing rates.
Perception of consanguineous marriage among the Qatari population (2023): Published in Frontiers in Public Health, this survey of 1,200 Qataris reported consanguinity rates of 54% overall, with first-cousin marriages at 35-40%. It associates these with elevated risks of hereditary blood disorders (e.g., thalassemia) and calls for expanded premarital genetic screening. The study notes that while cultural factors sustain the practice, education levels inversely correlate with participation.
Congenital Anomalies in Consanguineous Arab Communities (2025): A retrospective analysis in an Israeli Arab town, published by the European Society of Medicine, examined 1,000+ children and found a 7.33% rate of congenital anomalies—higher than the global average of 6% in similar communities. Common issues included cardiovascular defects, neural tube defects, and hemoglobinopathies, directly attributed to high local inbreeding coefficients from cousin marriages (prevalence ~40-50%).
Assessment of Perceptions and Predictors Towards Consanguinity: A Cross-Sectional Study from Palestine (2023): In the Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, researchers surveyed 800 Palestinians and reported consanguinity rates of 40-45%, with predictors including rural residence and low education. It connects this to increased infant mortality and genetic load, advocating for community-based interventions.
Community Genetics in Real Time: Congenital Anomalies and Genetic Disorders in an Israeli Arab Town (2025): This study, also from the European Society of Medicine, reinforced elevated anomaly rates (7.33%) in a high-consanguinity setting, linking inbreeding to disorders like monilethrix and chromosomal issues.
Barry's an inbred Royal/ Moslem?
Broader Context
These studies build on longstanding data showing Arab countries have some of the world's highest consanguinity rates (20-60% of marriages, per 2025 World Population Review estimates), driven by socioeconomic, cultural, and tribal factors rather than any unique "Arab" predisposition. Impacts include a 2-3x higher risk of recessive genetic disorders, but fertility effects are mixed—some show slight declines, others none. Efforts like Qatar's and Saudi Arabia's premarital screening programs have reduced rates modestly (e.g., from 56% to 50% in Oman over a decade).