> Your research wasn't in vain as you studied the over 1000 page LOWM.
It wasn't worth studying because the link was based on foolish number matching, not logic or reason. Some grifters pretended that what Q wrote was incomprehensible without a decode. Influenced Anons looked for numerical decodes and number matching. There was never a good logical match with the LoWM. Sorry.
>but as it turns out it was valuable knowledge
That such manuals and military publications are of value is not in doubt or a matter of debate. The foolish number matching between the writings of Q and other sources simply spreads confusion, as intended. Grifters don't work for free, and the Q material was - and is -intentionally obfuscated by the concept of 'decodes'.
Cold saliva and bruises shaped like occlusal surfaces.
It is working out in the long term. It was a waste of energy and enthusiasm as well as a planned distraction and enemy smokescreen. Anons fell for all kinds of BS and must be more wary if called upon for another op. Q told us long ago after a tragedy.
RIP, Mike Green.
Kek. Those are cirrus clouds formed by aircraft emissions.
The US SW Region sets records every year for air travel. Aircraft induce cirrus cloud cover. Residents blame fictional 'spraying' and yet never register the increase in air traffic.
>it also kept us calm so our research could gain credibility to keep others calm.
We, the Anons, were amplifiers in a military deception campaign. /qresearch was a conduit. We repeated what we were encouraged to repeat, per Q.
Love you, Anon. Embrace your growth.
>any reason you Q research assholes are here if this is what you think?
To educate. Many took an oath to help you.
You are a NewFag.