>>23925801
>FUCKING FOOLS
Jesus warned you about that.
Read 18 USC 241 and 242 while you're at it Trump.
Donald John Trump is currently engaged in Conspiracy Against Rights.
Those who reminded military they have a duty to defy unlawful orders.
Stop shilling for tyranny tyrant.
It doesn't matter, Donald Trump is currently and publicly engaged in conspiracy against rights, and deprivation of rights under color of law.
And you should be glad I'm not.
The fact of the matter is, no one on the left stood up to their "sides" lawlessness. If we don't stand up to the lawlessness on our "side" because our "side" is winning, we're no better.
Trump is KNOWINGLY publicly engaged in conspiracy against rights. Now do you support freedom of speech and the constitution and rights of the American People or do you support lawless law enforcement?
Cry moar
I did. >>23925929
Any law, even on the books, that violates a right is null, and any one enforcing that law is committing a federal crime. Anyone looking for a way to enforce a law to oppress or "punish" because someone exercised a right is committing a federal crime.
No law can criminalize the right to free speech.
Except I'm the one standing for the constitution and actual law.
KMFAO notice you can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger.
What does the 1st amendment say?
>Congress shall make no lawrespecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; orabridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Reminding the US Military they have a DUTY to refuse unlawful orders is free and protected speech.
What is Trump trying to do here? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115642722629712717
He's talking about using color of law to punish for exercising a right.
He was right, he could shoot someone in the street and you would be too stupid to care.
I'm not hiding, I stand by what I say in the light. I stand by the rights of even those I disagree with.
Many CLAIM they love freedom, they even think they do, but they hate it with an absolute passion. The love THEIR freedom. What they want and love is a king, be it a man or a group (party) that agrees with and likes, and disagrees with and dislikes the same things as them. If they agree/like it, everyone should be "free" to do it, but if they don't agree/like it, it should be illegal, and even if it's not illegal you should still suffer because they say so!
Trumps done a good job getting them to expose themselves.
No, it's not. Free speech is free. Trump is KNOWINGLY violating federal law.
I know A LOT more than you think kek.
Tell me, what rights are spelled out in the declaration of independence, our founding document, and protected by the 9th amendment to the US Constitution?
KMAO You do not decide what others freedoms are.
Reminding military of their duty is absolutely free speech. Watch.
EVERY member of the US Military has a DUTY to refuse unlawful orders.
See, free speech.
Yet it's my right to remind them. Why do you hate free speech?
You do know they're SERVANTS of the people right?
You can ridicule all you want, but when someone tries to use color of law to "punish" for exercising a right, well they've committed a crime.
If it violates the rights of Americans, it's unlawful. Military HAVE to be able to think for themselves and not be mindless order followers.
Notice how you can't attack the message, so you project "commie" on the messenger.
Why do you hate free speech?
Good job exposing yourself though.
Newsflash, Truth is Truth no matter what you think of the one speaking it.
>The consequences of your speech
Uh huh. I'm glad you agree with consequences.
You learned not to sell yourself like a prostitute to corrupt government and willfully bind yourself in chains, a chain of command?
Martial law requires certain conditions be met. What happens when there is a conspiracy to cause those conditions so they can be met, to deprive rights?
>Mother Mary
Why do they say the messiah is the Son of Mary? Mary calls Him Lord, how can He be her son?
>Then Jesus said to them, “Why is it said that the Messiah is the son of David? David calls him ‘Lord.’ How then can he be his son?”
Among those born to women, none have arisen greater than John, but even the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
Reminding military they have a duty to defy unlawful orders is a right, no matter how much you hate that right.
I never sold myself to corrupt government and forsook my freedom to bind myself in chains for "order" no.
I'm quite familiar with the law.
The dems? You think this is about the dems? lol. It's not just the dems. The left wing and the right wing and both controlled by the same "mind".
It's not only the dems engaged in conspiracy against rights.
That depends on if you "obeyed" lawless government or exercised your rights in their face.
I don't care how much they hate Truth, it's still True.
They are SERVANTS paid by the people.
Uh huh KMFAO.
I don't know what it's like to sell myself like a prostitute to corrupt government and bind myself in a chain of command for a paycheck.
I do know what it's like to stand up and call lawless government lawless and tell it to go fuck itself.
You mean serves the highest bidder.
The left wing and the right wing are both controlled by the same mind.
If they have a problem with being servants of the people, well I guess outing them is a good thing.
You better read the constitution kmao
We the People of the United States…
Now go read the declaration of independence as well. What does it say the people have a right and duty to do?
>I have no argument so I'm running away
Yet you can't argue against the message, only attack the messenger. You have no argument.
I fall back on Truth. You don't debate because you CAN'T.