>>2392704 (all pb)
I retract my statement. She likely had the response already as a "just in case".
I doubt Sarah would be the one to confirm the Q connection to the world.
No. Her response was, but unfortunately, through a bad choice of words–or rather lack of clarification–she did passively, unintentionally agree the Qanon group was a violent one.
Reporter: (Paraphrasing) "What does the President think of all these violent Qanon people harassing reporters at rallies?"
Sarah: "Of course, the President/administration does not endorse violent behavior…(goes on to tryand take another shot at it but again reiterates the first line)."
Reporter: "Not that they were violent, but…"
And it dithered away. To be fair, the reporter kind of saved it, in my eyes; he was the one to actually state the movement/people were not physically violent.
I'd need to rewatch the footage to get the precise nuance.