>>23928083

A) So what? this is 2025

B) Wikipedia? Really?

>>23928082

Who is "We?"

>>23928094

I suggest a dose of "gender equality" be administered to the facial area

>>23928116

Kek

Since there's two of them I can't declare them "non-binary"

>>23928102

That's nice

Question was "who is 'we'?"

>>23928171

The question was "who is 'we'?"

>>23928183

Algo probs bot boi?

The question was "who is 'we'?"