>>2393139 (PB video)

RIGHT PSYCHOLOGYFAGS, SINK YOUR TEETH IN

At 1:18, Sarah STOPS addressing the press directly, after arguably stumbling through the first part.

I'm wagering she was thrown off by the question not being "Who/what is Q? Is it real?" and being a two-parter so she has to work in both answers.

She goes for the "violence/fringe groups" bit first before moving on to do the big Q.

Accidentally, she answers "the first part of your question" (that mentioned violence and Q) and states they OBVIOUSLY don't support violent groups.

THEN, Sarah moves on to the answer she has been given to say about Q. At 1:18, she starts reading from the paper.

THIS IS WHERE SHE STARTS HAVING TROUBLE

She is trying to work in an obviously prepared answer to "Is Q real?" or the like but that wasn't the question asked.

"Does Trump support these violent fringe Qanon etc. groups?" was asked.

Her answer to the "What do you think about reporters being attacked?"–the second question–she starts talking about there always being administrations that have leaks and classified material etc., an answer that makes no sense in asked context but much more for a "Is there someone in the admin guiding people to generally classified/secret materials/groups etc.?"

If you want the Q groups prepared answer for Sarah or any other admin member other than Trump, you can hear it in its basic form starting at 1:18. Perhaps a few seconds earlier.