>>23937976 Tyb o7
>'Group Think'
At what point does group think become sedition?
At what point does group think become corrupt, problematic, and harmful?
I thought this movement was one that was connected by a phenomenon
So, do these involve behavioral issues?
Would this be a quick solution?
This might be a good idea, but can we go further and test whether someone is suitable?
For example, whether they are part of this movement or not?
How about asking them to prove these things in detail?
How about explaining their own thoughts clearly?