>>2394379

Perfectly within the range of known AI capabilities.

To recognize a bot, notice what they CAN'T DO.

For example, BO ABOLUTELY CAN NOT break the character he portrays here. This awkward, "chan lingo" cussing and berating– that is ALL that BO can portray. There will never be a moment when BO "shows another side of his personality", because all he is is a bundle of algorithms, and constraints on AI impose serious limitations.

>>2394446

H

0

w dew

w

ee

noe

u

r

hy

oo

man?

>>2394481

It would certainly make sense for Q dispel concerns about the nature of BO, wouldn't it? ASSUMING such concerns were unfounded…

>>2394515

O really? So the new AI is improved?

>>2394519

Well, we need to do better than that. The AI is dominating discourse, and creating a board that is flooded with crap that portrays us negatively, and stymies us in countless ways.

>>2394446

>>2394476

>>2394515

>>2394534

IT ALWAYS OUTS ITSELF LIKE THIS. LOOK ANONS.

>>2394391

He always has a reason.

Is there a more critical question for this board THAN THE SECURITY OF THIS BOARD?

>>2394920

Thanks anon. You're the first to sign. God bless you.

>>2394953

>>2394920

And there wouldn't be any need to choose contributers, presumably, we would be in a better position to get rid of inflowing garbage, delete all the crap out of threads, etc. Assuming that there isn't a way to filter out the AI from further upstream, which would be fantastic…