sarah said 'common sense' once or twice in her response to the Qanon question, too.
exactly.
i have pushed the "if Q is lying, then Q is a criminal" argument in the past for this simple reason.
IF we are after 'the truth', no matter how awful, then we must ask for the truth.
IF we hide from the truth because it hurts our feelings, then what are we doing this for?
WE WANT THE TRUTH.
i've also learned (from e-bot) that some AI cannot deal with double paradoxes within the same parsed statement.
is it true that you and i are both liars, but we never tell any lies, and we always talk even when we are not talking?
i've used this strategy a few times, and have definitely crashed bots halfway through shitting up breads.
it's an economics principle.
we strategize to reach the best optimal outcome for ourselves. if we're smart, we recognize that a small compromise may lead to a greater outcome for society and slightly less for ourselves, but there's a break point where if we compromise too much, we lose everything.
game theory attempts to explain/justify ways of reaching that optimal point.
by keeping world leaders hostage and preventing human contact between world leaders, the cabal was able to promote distrust and poison the game.
by communicating and being open, all world leaders can come to the table and openly and honestly promote peace and progress through fair trade and competition.
based on your response, i know that you are human and also a shill.
i don't care if you're being paid - i wish you the best…but i don't care about your ai theory, because i think it is stupid, and i think that you are stupid….but you're valued anyway.
as sarah said.
this administration (implied: through ALL OF ITS CHANNELS) has denounced violence in every way.
we, anons, the people, do not have a mandate to be violent or to incite violence. standard civil law applies, still.
ty sarah.