Let me just spell out some obvious stuff:

• This board does not advocate for, or carry out, any acts of violence.

• The opponents of this board want to paint us as though we advocate for, or carry out, acts of violence.

• Opponents may either cherrypick, misinterpret, or falsely attribute 'violent' things to this board.

• The more questionable things we allow on this board (nudity, offensive content, even Nasim) are not guaranteed to be used against us, but increase the likelihood that at least something will. It is in our best interest therefore to restrain from posting the content, and oppose its posting in general.

• Some allegedly 'violent' events have already happened, either through cherrypicking, misinterpretation, or false attribution. One is the blocking of the dam by an anon.

• If POTUS openly supports Q amidst allegations of violence, the media will immediately link POTUS to 'violent' events, most notably the now-imprisoned dam blocker. This is a relatively untenable beachhead for the mainstream Q movement.

We must be on our best behavior for some time and allow the proper context for POTUS. He does not have to say he supports us; he could simply verify the existence of Q. It would be much more useful if the question posed is "Mr. President, do you believe Q Anon?" rather than "Mr. President, do you support your radical Q Anon fringe extremists?"

Remember that as depressing and angering as work here can be, we must remain nonviolent. Don't allow yourself to be tempted or persuaded by agitators. We should hope, after all, to be the good guys.