>>>2355675, >>2351700, >>2349367 BO/BV on nudity/thot policy (incl history)
NO MORE NASIM WORSHIP ON Q'S BOARD EITHER!!!
Probably?
She was a shooter…that would definitely do more harm to us than a set of tits being shown!
BO/BV
We need you to ban NASIM photos now more than ever!!
Consider this!
She was the shooter that shot up Yahoo!
You have anons in here worshipping her like a fucking god or something.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/us/who-is-nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooter/index.html
Her being here will DEFINITELY tie us into a violent group!
She is worse than tits being shown on here anyday now that we are mainstream!
Fuck you, yes.
Ban this bitch NOW!
She is a shooter and we are not affiliated with violence like the asshat that just posted her pic again.
She don't belong here now that we are mainstream.
Some MSM will catch one of those nasim bitch worshippers in the act, and it's all over MSM "Proof of Q Cult and it's ties to violence".
Pretty fucking easy to see happening.
Wasn't me that said no tits!
But now here you all are acting like the libtards we are fighting against when there is a REAL problem with something being posted here now.
So you can fuck right off snowflake!
Just proved your full of shit.
Police talked with YouTube shooter hours before attack – and say they didn't notice anything disturbing
www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/us/who-is-nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooter/index.html
It's about not being tied to violence.
Open your fucking eyes!
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/us/who-is-nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooter/index.html
Fuck off and die, bitch!
More reason to leave the yahoo shooter off this board now!
I'm not fucking worried if porn is banned or not!
The violence that stupid cunt brought into a public building and firing rounds is what makes her a threat to our 'non-violent' status.
It's certainly not any help having faggots in here worshipping that stupid cunt either.