Anonymous ID: dd5e30 Dec. 8, 2025, 6:12 a.m. No.23955578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5581 >>5587

[New York Times files lawsuit against the Pentagon due to the new physical security restrictions for reporters. Here is the physical security restrictions at the New York Times. Hypocrites.]

 

The New York Times physical security involves robust measures like concrete barriers, controlled access points, and potentially ID badges (like the new PFACs for media), requiring escorts for visitors, all designed to protect staff amidst heightened media hostility, with specific systems for internal/external access managed through their security protocols for employees and approved guests.

 

Key Aspects of NYT Physical Security:

 

External Deterrents: They use physical barriers, such as concrete blocks, provided by the NYPD, to secure the building perimeter.

 

Controlled Entry Points: Access to the building and specific areas is tightly controlled, likely using key cards, biometric scanners, or similar access control systems.

 

Visitor Management: Visitors, especially media, require escorts to enter sensitive areas, with badges (like new "PRESS" PFACs for media) to identify authorized personnel.

 

Heightened Security: These measures are a response to increased threats and hostility toward journalists, necessitating increased physical security for staff.

Internal Protocols: While specific tech isn't detailed, they have internal procedures for staff and authorized personnel to move around the facility securely.

 

In essence, the NYT employs a multi-layered physical security approach combining infrastructure (barriers), technology (access control), and personnel protocols (escorts, badges) to ensure safety.

 

(Above sauce is AI google generated answer)

 

The New York Times Is Suing the Pentagon. The Case Is Laughable

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/new-york-times-is-suing-pentagon-case-is/

Anonymous ID: dd5e30 Dec. 8, 2025, 6:50 a.m. No.23955725   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5731 >>6006 >>6134 >>6190

The New York Times Is Suing the Pentagon. The Case Is Laughable

 

Dec 6 2025 (excerpts)

 

Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona formed the “Senator Mark Kelly Legal Defense Fund” in Phoenix on Friday, the records indicate. Roy Herrera, a political law attorney and founding partner of Herrera Arellano LLP, is listed as the fund’s custodian.

 

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, of Michigan, formed the “Senator Slotkin Legal Defense Fund” on Thursday in Washington, D.C., IRS records indicate. Steven Mele, a principal at MBA Consulting Group, a D.C.-based political compliance firm, is listed as the defense fund’s custodian.

Their legal defense funds state in their filings that they’re “Senate approved,” and both senators’ offices confirmed that they received prior approval from the Senate Ethics Committee — a prerequisite for forming such funds.

Slotkin and Kelly aren’t alone among Democratic senators creating legal funds to defend against Trump’s threats.

 

In August, Sen. Adam Schiff of California created his own fund after Trump asked the Department of Justice to investigate Schiff for previously leading an investigation into the president’s alleged connections with Russia.

 

Legal defense funds created on behalf of senators must abide by a series of disclosure and fundraising rules. For example, individual donors are capped at contributing $10,000 per person, and various people and entities — corporations, unions, lobbyists, foreign agents, Senate employees — are prohibited from contributing at all.

 

The funds must also file quarterly reports with the Senate Ethics Committee identifying donors who’ve given more than $25.

 

https://www.notus.org/senate/mark-kelly-elissa-slotkin-legal-defense-fund-sedition-donald-trump

Anonymous ID: dd5e30 Dec. 8, 2025, 6:52 a.m. No.23955731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6006 >>6134 >>6190

>>23955725

 

OOOPS!

 

Here is the actual headline.

 

Democratic Senators Who Trump Accused of ‘Sedition’ Form Legal Defense Funds

 

https://www.notus.org/senate/mark-kelly-elissa-slotkin-legal-defense-fund-sedition-donald-trump