>>2393431 pb Remember: we are Q Research!
Thanks. Agree. SS was deft with the deflection. Strange how they keep singling out BLACKS FOR TRUMP. Can't figure out that one out yet.
Whats really brilliant about that response is that she just paraphrased an excerpt of
>JFK - Secret Socities
speech aka "The President & the Press".
If anyone wants a confirmation from SS, we may have just gotten it. Slipped right under the press's noses without even a clue.
https://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/JFK-Speeches/American-Newspaper-Publishers-Association_19610427.aspx
The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.
On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DznTND–4eI