By voicing a pardon of Tina Peters, Q+ just baited the cult into admitting that their system logically defines crime as justice and justice as crime.
They will and already are screaming to the public that the illegal charge and corrupt conviction was legal, and that perfectly legal activity is criminal.
By baiting the cult into admitting that their system outputs both X and ~X are proved (to itself) as true, that is, that the same system, its axioms and theorems, are demonstrating a logical inconsistency at the level of the laws of the land, the Q team is now exposing the cult, with Kurt Godel like efficiency, as being inconsistent. Inconsistent in the application of government level prosecution!
Recall the Q drops with "up is down, left is right".
This anon believes that Q+ voicing he "negates" the charge and conviction of Tina Peters, that this is to trick the cult, and its legacy media and politician puppet assets, to yell at the top of their lungs that Peters is guilty and the charges were just. Thereby self-detonating into DELEGITIMING their own political existence.
"Look at me everyone, I label legal activity as illegal, and illegal activity as legal!"
Once you demonstrate that a system, however large, powerful, complex and sophisticated it is, to be logically structured in its own source code to contain not only an inconsistency, which we have all done at one point, we all make mistakes, but for the incosnsitency to be totalitarian in scope, to posture authority and practise inconsistency IN THE APPLICATION OF STATE/FEDERAL LAW, such a system will be an exiatential threat to the survival of the species. It is that serious. What other likely outcome wouls happen if a species on one planet was guided by a system that would "prove to itself" as TRUE that its own existence should not exist?
Any complex formal system capable of basic arithmetic that contains just one inconsistency, would be "capable" of "proving" ANY statement, no matter how insane it is, as "true".
The Q team, as I see it, is now baiting the cult into admitting that their inconsistent system is so pronounced it goes all the way to the application of government laws, proving to itself that legal activity is illegal, and illegal activity is legal.
Tina Peters is innocent. Her "crime" as falsely accused, was RETAINING DATA that by law MUST ME RETAINED.
The cult USED to "win" their sick game of demanding the worls tolerate its inconsistency, by DELETING/SUPPRESSING/DESTROYING/OMITTING data, information, real objects of cognitive moments, that otherwise would be fed back into the systemmof humanity and humanity would detect its internal bugs, and problem solving natural inclinations would CORRECT THE INCONSISTENCY.
So the question is, what should humanity do to anyone who knowingly and maliciously steives to increase inconsistencies, DIVISIONS, within humanity so as to repress, oppress, exploit, FEED off "itself", with the ideological directors CONTROLLING a controlled demolition of the human species?
Through wars.
Viruses.
Mass shootings.
Mass abortion.
Will humanity REDISCOVER a logical universal that binds all regardless of tribe?
Law of non contradiction?
Let's see the "anti-racist" racists prove the law of non contradiction is a "mistake" of creation.
Anon watching closely…