Actually if Tina Peters is guilty then so is all the companies that did backups on the server software including any software repositories that they used. She did not alter the data, just copied it, technically not a crime, only altering it is. Election software should be 100% transparent because no matter what, it is the property of the people, because states did away with paper ballots, they took away our intellectual property, therefor, the software regardless of costs and programming intellectual property and all claims, belongs to we the people. Private voting systems are easily susceptible to fraud when it is not transparent. And if that is the case, then we need a shot at our own private software to be used next election in CO. and everywhere Dominion was used. We can win on all accounts, I am always right.