Disclose.tv
@disclosetv
·
26m
NEW - Canada's Mark Carney names top former BlackRock manager Mark Wiseman, as Canada's next ambassador to the U.S. — Globe and Mail
https://gab.com/disclosetv/posts/115707535943843875
President Trump signs executive order to block state-level AI regulations
https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/president-trump-signs-executive-order-to-block-state-level-ai-regulations/
President Pardons Peters – Polis Says See You in Court
coloradofreepress.com/president-pardons-peter…
Digital IDs and AI Dreams: How Canada and Europe Plan to Sync the Future
reclaimthenet.org/canada-eu-digital-identity-…
Digital IDs and AI Dreams: How Canada and Europe Plan to Sync the Future
reclaimthenet.org/canada-eu-digital-identity-…
JUST IN - Trump admin prepares to enlist private businesses and cybersecurity firms to mount offensive cyberattacks against foreign adversaries.
disclose.tv/id/e8norbrfve/
An American In Africa: Memories of Rhodesia
jacklawsonbooks.substack.com/p/anoma-anoma-an…
The Americans that fought Anti-Communist wars in Africa most of you have never heard of AND the Survival Mentality you must have when chaos comes to America
by Jack Lawson, Dec 11, 2025
[Photo: they did not have enough helicopters, so they used fixed-wing aircraft and parachutes to land blocking and pursuit forces after ground units made contact. Sometimes twice a day. They had more combat jumps than every American unit post WW2 combined.]
A federal judge ruled on Dec. 11 that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has unlawfully terminated a pre-disaster mitigation program and ordered the agency to reverse its action.
Read more:
theepochtimes.com/us/judge-orders-fema-to-rev…
aeson Jones Exclusive With Mexico Capt. Jose Diaz: 'Cutting Chain of Support' for Drug Trafficking
newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/mexico-drug-cartels/20…
Newsmax border correspondent Jaeson Jones reported Saturday from Mexico City after securing an exclusive interview with Captain José Diaz, an intelligence officer with the Mexican Navy.
Diaz revealed the staggering scale of chemical precursors flowing into Mexico for cartel drug production.
Diaz told Jones in an interview that aired on "Saturday Agenda" that in just 13 months, naval operations have seized more than 800 tons of chemical precursors arriving from China and other countries, materials used in clandestine labs to manufacture synthetic drugs such as fentanyl.
"We are cutting the chain of support," Diaz said, emphasizing that the Navy is relying on intelligence, new technology, and constant operations to disrupt cartel operations.
[Rest at link, plus video]
Shawn Ryan went thermonuclear on Eyepatch McCain after he threatened Ryan with "his boys at [SEAL Team] 6." This video has had 1.5 million views in 12 hours.
youtube.com/watch?v=ojGa8e_NnDM
American Troops To Ukraine For Blackrock? How About…No
cdm.press/opinion/2025/12/12/american-troops-…
Matt Bracken @Matt_Bracken48 • 1s
g… Ukraine Phase One: Make billions of dollars selling weapons while millions
are killed and Ukraine is wrecked. Ukraine Phase Two: Make billions of dollars rebuilding Ukraine, own the land, and import millions of Middle Eastern and African men to repopulate
the country.
Dominic Michael Tripi • @DMichaelTripi • 17h NEW: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink now directly involved in Ukraine
negotiations with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. -Bloomberg
Joseph A. Camp
@JoeyCamp2020
·
13h
The assumption is that a President doesnt have the power to pardon state level offense, but as I have said, the Constitutional provisions for Presidential Pardons states presidents can pardon "offenses against the United States". There has never been a case to define what exactly is an "offenses against the Unoted States" and so all the legal "scholars" and "experts" are relying on assumptions of the definition of those words.
Until the United States Surpreme Court defines "offenses against the Unoted States", no one knows truely how far of a reach the Presidential power of Pardon extends.
This is also true in the birthright citizenship definition, which was also assumed, but will shortly be defined conclusively.
So, I say to you all, have faith, for Tina Peters, because the Surpreme Court is majority favorable, and this is brand new legal argument -because previous Presidents were too stupid or just assumed without legal definition, the reach of their pardon power. However, Trump is now going to be the first President to force the Surpreme Court to define those very important terms "offenses against the United States" and thus define the limits and reach of Presidential Pardon.
https://gab.com/JoeyCamp2020/posts/115704516384387790
Joseph A. Camp
@JoeyCamp2020
·
13h
I wrote an essay, exclusively for GAB, on why Presidents have exclusive and sole pardon power, for state and federal offenses, and that we have been doing it all wrong for 250 years (governors have no pardon authority).
Part 2 in the comment section below:
The Scope of Presidential Pardon Power: A Reexamination of "Offenses Against the United States" in Light of Original Constitutional Design
As an enthusiast of constitutional law, I have long been intrigued by the interpretive challenges posed by Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the President the authority "to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." This provision, ratified amid the foundational debates of 1788–1789, invites a deeper inquiry into the framers' intent regarding the breadth of executive clemency. Specifically, does this power extend solely to federal offenses, or might it encompass state-level crimes under a broader understanding of what constitutes an "offense against the United States"? In this essay, I advance the argument that a faithful originalist reading supports the latter interpretation, potentially allowing presidential pardons to reach state offenses—a position that challenges longstanding assumptions but aligns with the Constitution's textual and structural logic.
To appreciate this perspective, we must first contextualize the criminal jurisdiction envisioned by the framers at the time of ratification. The Constitution delineates a federal government of enumerated powers, and in the realm of criminal law, it explicitly empowers Congress to address only a narrow trio of offenses: (1) the counterfeiting of U.S. securities and current coin (Article I, Section 8, Clause 6); (2) piracies and felonies on the high seas, as well as offenses against the law of nations (Article I, Section 8, Clause 10); and (3) treason, defined in Article III, Section 3 as "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort," with Congress authorized to declare the punishment therefor. These provisions reflect the framers' wariness of centralized authority, born from colonial experiences under British rule, and their commitment to a federal system where states retained primary sovereignty over criminal matters.
Yet, the pardon power's phrasing—"Offences against the United States"—is not explicitly confined to these three categories. To infer such a limitation would require reading into the text a restriction that the framers did not articulate, contrary to principles of textualism. Consider the internal consistency of the document: the same phrase, "against the United States," appears in the treason clause, where it encompasses acts that threaten the Union's integrity. If an individual were to levy war against a single state—say, Pennsylvania—exclusively targeting its government, institutions, and populace within its borders, could this not be construed as an offense against the United States? After all, the states are constituent parts of the federal whole; an assault on one undermines the collective sovereignty enshrined in the Preamble's commitment to "form a more perfect Union." The framers, drawing from Enlightenment ideas of federalism as articulated in The Federalist Papers (e.g., Federalist No. 39 by Madison, emphasizing the compound nature of the republic), likely viewed the Union as indivisible in this regard. Thus, "offenses against the United States" may denote any crime that impairs the national fabric, irrespective of whether it is prosecuted under federal or state auspices.
https://gab.com/JoeyCamp2020/posts/115704698862666631
Joseph A. Camp
@JoeyCamp2020
·
3d
There has never been a case raised in any court, anywhere in the US about a President pardoning a state level offense.
Trump needs to Pardon Tina Peters and then let the matter go through the courts.
Free Tina.
https://gab.com/JoeyCamp2020/posts/115687261712602032
Joseph A. Camp
@JoeyCamp2020
·
16h
Two days ago I made my comment.
It's almost as if…
https://gab.com/JoeyCamp2020/posts/115703925942937566