dChan
Anonymous ID: 2c89ad Aug. 1, 2018, 4:36 p.m. No.2399901   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9949

>>2399803

>>2399837

 

Considering the MSM lies that are being spread about us right now, I don't think it's a bad idea to have a mission statement that broadly lays out what we stand for and what we are supporting, as well as a clear and concise statement that we oppose violence. period.

Anonymous ID: 2c89ad Aug. 1, 2018, 4:40 p.m. No.2399987   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0350

>>2399862

 

Watch David Seaman if you want to hear about how utterly fuckin awesome David Seaman is. If you like people that say "fuckin" 10 times a sentence, you're also in luck.

Anonymous ID: 2c89ad Aug. 1, 2018, 4:42 p.m. No.2400057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0090

>>2399776

No.

But I will say this, I wish Sanders was given a better canned answer than the one she delivered.

That said, it seems like she fucked up the canned answer. The reporter had two parts to his question:

  1. Fringe groups like Qanon

  2. Violence against reporters

She oddly conflated the second question about violence with the first. My only thought could be that by flat out stating that the president condemns any groups that promote violence is getting ahead of any future clown attempts to false flag in Qs name. By saying we condemn any groups that promote violence, she's essentially saying your not for Trump. Thus sending a clear message that Q followers should not commit violent acts, undercutting any future attempts by clowns to paint a narrative that Q is a violent movement that the president refused to reign in.

Anonymous ID: 2c89ad Aug. 1, 2018, 4:47 p.m. No.2400133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2400060

In my opinion, this isn't an attempt to shield "normies" from joining Qanon. Instead, it seems like a way to shore up their leftist base against it.

The added exposure, on the other hand, may be enough to pull the middle into Q's corner.

That said, I'm sure as fuck ready for the truth to come out and a feast of crow to be served.

Anonymous ID: 2c89ad Aug. 1, 2018, 4:53 p.m. No.2400282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0306 >>0318 >>0322 >>0365 >>0378

>>2400090

Here's my thing, let's say the media actually asks Trump himself about Q. What can he actually say to legitimize the movement?

If legitimizes Q, it would effectively be admitting to unauthorized disclosure.

Of course he could provide an answer that would sound like nothing to normies, but legitimize Q, something to the effect of:

"I've been asked this question 16 times, and I've already given the answer 16 times. So I'll answer for the 17th time…think logically."