Anonymous ID: fdf019 Dec. 19, 2025, 9:04 a.m. No.24002033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2080

>>24001965

Wiles told me she underestimated the potency of the scandal: “Whether he was an American CIA asset, a Mossad asset, whether all these rich, important men went to that nasty island and did unforgivable things to young girls,” she said, “I mean, I kind of knew it, but it’s never anything I paid a bit of attention to.”

///

Trump has claimed, without evidence, that Bill Clinton visited Epstein’s infamous private island, Little St. James, “supposedly 28 times.” “There is no evidence” those visits happened, according to Wiles; as for whether there was anything incriminating about Clinton in the files, “The president was wrong about that.”

 

So does Trump get his views on Epstein from Wiles? Is that how this works?

Anonymous ID: fdf019 Dec. 19, 2025, 9:50 a.m. No.24002243   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2277

>>24002091

In response, Ms. Wiles went on social media after the story was published to call it “a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history.” She took no issue with any of the facts in the article, but said only that “significant context was disregarded and much of what I, and others, said about the team and the President was left out of the story.”

 

She went and did the interview, what context did they leave out or is she doing a Pelosi and doing some after the fact cover