>Is anyone else having there genitals shocked?
Only with 110v. It tickles.
> Someone is thinking about your snootch
>I don't know anything about tribal tattoos, but I don't judge someone for what they place on their body.
To anon, anyone with a tat is an automatic NPC.
>be me
>birthday coming
>wifeanon wants to know "my plans"
>IDK, maybe casino?
>plans change, do something productive
>"maybe tomorrow"
>next day decide bonfire moar fun
>wake up to wifeanon being cranky
>"When are we ACTUALLY going to the casino?"
>MFW hypothetical birthday plans turn into chore
>only yourself. only your view
That's my view.
People with tats are NPC until proven otherwise.
I'm sure there's some fine ones out there, but simply non complying with the mind virus to get one is enough to prove existence of a brian.
>24005500
>Styles change, you're getting old and crotchety.
You're being defensive.
Just anon's opinion.
Not saying anon wouldn't hire someone with a tat, but would probably give preference to someone without one, especially for a job requiring brians or public exposure.
Tards got tats. The principle of FAFO doesn't sleep.
kek
the very fact that anon kicked up a hornets nest by not approving of chemical / physical alterations of the human form.
>>24005519 (You)
>KEK. Your opinion is that I'm being defensive because I said you're getting old and crotchety?
No sauce to what you said.
Anon's opinion is as good as yours.
Opinion still stands that tat tards deserve to be judged as NPCs.