Anonymous ID: 687551 Dec. 21, 2025, 1:07 p.m. No.24011754   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24011661

>years ago an observation such as this one would have gotten me attacked for the rest of the bread

 

Now it just inspires a few chuckles at how impotent muh joo shills have been for the last eight years

Don't feel bad, hollyweird has scriptwriters just as shitty as the ones you have

Anonymous ID: 687551 Dec. 21, 2025, 1:24 p.m. No.24011824   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1850

>>24011768

Actually I'm going to chuckle at your expense. Your "legitimate question" is part of the same scripted bullshit posted around 8 for years.

Now's the part where you and comrades try to keep an argument going to waste bread.

You and your cubicle buddies have a nice time, I'm doing stuff so won't waste any more time

Anonymous ID: 687551 Dec. 21, 2025, 2:24 p.m. No.24012081   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2119

>>24011936

>Donald Trump called the Jeffrey Epstein scandal โ€œa hoaxโ€

Which got the demands started

>and then he delayed the declassification of itโ€™s related files

making the files wanted even more

Consider the upcoming mid-term elections

Democrats will scream at Republicans for not demanding unredacted releases. Repubs will yell back at the Dems about their own inaction during the Potato Admin.

Anons will have the opportunity to remind the public at large how none of them did shit and thus get several primaried.

I still see the DNC going to try a "fresh faces" approach as the "my years of experience" won't work with the "years of kicking shit down the road while voting yourselves pay raises and enjoying the hospitality of lobbyists" getting thrown at them

 

I've been rather busy with other things myself but have not forgotten the players currently on the bench are worth a look. There's current players just deciding not to run for reelection, some will get flame sprayed by the Epstein Files, others may have unfortunate accidents, etc. Who is it in the wings that are going to be presented as the great heroes to "restore the faith in government?"