>>24024207
>EVERYONE
TEST
SEC_TEST
How did he do it?
He didn't took the 5th vaccine.
He didn't wear a mask.
He didn't wear our concentra… quarantine camp.
And he was the only one who survived.
>>24024381
>Those are Scanned TIFF no?
Don't do it.
DON'T.
>ultimate authority
That's not how actual Germany worked.
The most powerful man in actual Germany was the mayor of every city.
But even these were accountable for their actions.
And it easily possible to throw them out when they fucked up.
The emperor did not have ultimate authority and was also accountable for his actions, as it should be.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely, that's why you don't allow that in the first place.
>no checks and balances
like atm with ABC agencies and politicians and senators and the fake news?
Actually most people simply want that their life isn't shit and they aren't robbed or raped on the streets and also that they don't work themselves to death.
That's it basically.
Also most people do not want war (that's what the fake news is for).
If a so called dictator can achieve that, so be it.
Dictator doesn't mean anything.
>but I want to vote for preselected parties and candidates
why?
Take Saddam Hussein for example.
Sure, if you went against him, you may have gotten into trouble, but that's what happens to you in all systems anyway. In "democracy" you wimply get taken out indirectly and most of the time silently.
Besides that the rest of the people were fine off in Iraq. Had working electricity. Schools. Basically western standards.
And fun fact: the corrupt western politicians had and still have WMDs. Saddam didn't.
Let that sink in.
Let me check what most people do regarding animal abuse.
Oh that's right.
Nothing at all.
They actually support it.
For example eggs.
Cage eggs
vs
free-range eggs
Guess what most people buy?
That's right. They don't give a flying SHIT about the animal, when the eggs are a tiny bit cheaper.
"hey, buy these eggs from chickens that are inside a tiny cage for their whole life, pumped up with antibiotics, or take these here from chickens that have a slightly better life"
"well duh, I will take the anitbiotics eggs"
"fuck, why am I getting sick?????"
That's reality.
As Q said - TEST
>it's not that they outright support it
they do, they are voting with their fake US dollars or other fake papers.
they are showing the cabal, "yes, we are evil, we don't give a shit, as long as it's slightly cheaper, torture animals more, we don't care, cage eggs? that's fine with us"
and then they complain that the cabal treats them as they treat animals.
In case of eggs there is no one that can't afford the slightly more expensive eggs. No one. The difference is a few cents. People are given a CHOICE, and they choose badly.
>they don't think about it
That makes no sense. They are given a choice. They choose cage eggs, based on the price and by intentionally ignoring the suffering of animals. Literally evil..
>Can you live in luxury watching others in need?
I don't, but I'm not a common man.
Tons can.
I was homeless in the last few years.
Homeless with a job, mind you.
Almost no one gave a shit.
In fact what I experienced during that time made me think that tons of so called humans are fucking evil and have no soul.
To be fair I also found really nice people, but only a tiny few.
Go to a farmer's market.
Ask if they sell free-range egs as well as cake eggs.
If they say yes they do, ask them how many they sell of each.
You will get the facts right into your brain.
For me it's not even a question.
But the factor is like 10:1 or 20:1.
They had like 2 packages of free range eggs, which they sold to me and a few others.
The rest of the packages, around 20 or 30 in total were cage eggs.
I call shit out when I see it, and this right here is total shit behavior and literally evil.
Everyone can afford these, but most actively decide against it.
Or take clothes, guess who made most of them, that's right slave labor in India or China.
People do not give a fuck about any of it.
>if they would see the chickens suffer
They are being told, they ignore the suffering of animals. They also ignore homeless people and treat them like shit.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Take for example family court lawyers. They earn more the longer the trial goes, but that's obviously bad for the children. In fact it would be better if women wouldn't divorce at all. Guess what these lawyers do?
They go for the money, as always.
They do not give a shit about fathers, children, not even their so called clients.
>our nation
>wealthy
Which nation are you talking about?
The US?
Wealthy?
I see tons of homeless people. I see drug addicts. Doesn't look wealthy at all.
>why worry about animals being tortured?
>there are bigger problems, so let's support animal torture
that makes no sense.
and let's think about it: people intentionally buy and EAT meat and eggs of TORTURED animals.
That surely won't have any negative consequences…
>homeless is a symptom of wealth
False.
In actual Germany there literally was no homelessness, because the system back then did not let it happen.
Not because it was fucking socialism.
In fact almost no one paid so called taxes back then.
Weird, isn't it.
I would call that wealthy, not because it's socialism, because it wasn't. Socialism sucks.
>best quality for lowest price, called "consumerism"
>best quality
"yummy, anitiotics and other pharma meds in my meat and eggs, tasty, and doesn't cost extra, I will take that for a dollar"
And to be honest, the more I think about it, the more I wonder if the system is evil, or if the system just tests people and most people are simply evil to the core.
In fact when I talked to the farmer, I had the feeling that he actually wanted to get rid of the cages himself, but can't, because the evil masses would reject the slightly higher prices.
He was like "yeah, you are one of the few that actually purchases these, sigh"
me
Linux is literally funded by tons of corporations, including Google, IBM, Microsoft etc.
If you think that ever actually was real competition, you would be out of your mind.
The nice part of open source is that there is no liability. It's a dream for ABC agencies.
Open source is also not really open. In tons of cases tightly controlled by marxists, using their call of conducts as a weapon to get rid of anyone that doesn't comply.
Also and that's a problem everywhere, tons of competent software developers went out of their jobs, and the newcomers are retarded, who have no clue what they are doing.
Especially for open source slop it's also always easier to add a new feature, instead of fixing features being broken or buggy. So that's what you get.
How can you make a photoshop tip "woke"?
>just do a pull request
denied by marxist owners
>just fork it and then support it forever
Nice unrealistic try.
Also get attacked by insane marxists.
It's on the level of "create your own party if you don't like the existing parties"
I already called that out.
Also to modify a software, you do not really need the source code.
Also
>everyone is a highly skilled software developer and can do anyting to any project and also has unlimited time
>everyone wants to use the work of insane marxists in the first place
>get the source
You literally replied to a post saying:
>pull request
>will get rejected by marxists
What do you think a pull request is?
That's the problem with "open" source, it's not open software. It's controlled. In fact I would have an easier job talking SAP into modifying something than doing the same to marxist projects.
And in fact with SAP it's not only open, but you can in fact modify the software and it will continue to work, even when updates are installed.
also the good old
>just fork it
was mentioned as well, which is retarded and unrealistic. You think everyone should fork Marxist Linux and Marxist GIMP and Marxist this and that and then support that forever, because everyone has unlimited time on their hands?
Are you insane?
>Why use Marxist shit in the first place
This is the correct question.
Use Photoshop instead. Adobe has paying customers, which means there is at least some control that the user has.
In this case it's about changing text.
You can edit text directly that is inside the executeable.
In fact just creating a program that does that would be easier, and you could still insall updates (but you would be retarded trusting Marxists).
>hacking machine code
That is in fact possible and software also gets disassembled all the time.
Open source means nothing at all.
It also doesn't improve security, only in your mind.
>just modify every single version that gets released
>manually
Most people have stuff to do.
>you have unlimited time on your hands
I don't.
>every use is a C/C++ developer
they aren't.
You simply are not a developer.
When you say "get the source", that means manually fixing/changing shit for EVERY SINGLE RELEASE. You get an update, and boom your changes are gone and you will have to do them again. Do you understand that? It's a waste of time.
And the only other ways available in that situation is:
>pull request
which will be rejected by Marxists
or
>fork the project
which is another stupid idea
Again: most users are not C++ developers.
Almost no one has time for this shit.
And only a retard would use software written by Marxists in the first place.
>get the source code
We had that already.
>just change it and build it
>and for another release
>just change it and build it
>and for another release
>just change it and build it
Are you without a job and without anything to do?
Normal people don't have time to waste on shitty software, and also most people are not C++ developers - again.
It is shitty software.
Everything woke is shit.
And GIMP is buggy and crappy on top of that.
If you used Photoshop and then that turd, you would know that.
Be gone Marxist
>just learn C++ lol
>just learn surgery too lol
>it's super easy lol
Explains why Linux software sucks for the most part.
The first 3 months of 2018 actually have been glorious already.
The public is taught that them saying no actually causes changes.
Ergo the public is taught that they actually have the power.
"Just say no"
Mark of the Beast.
>the cattle will never wake up
Challenge accepted a few years ago.
Last time I checked vaccine rates are down.
How many know about Epstein now compared to 2017?
Tick Tock
False.
If you were a software developer, you would know that "AI" is pure dog shit, especially for software development.
In fact it was proven that w/ "AI" BS productivity goes down, because "AI" produces slop and shit.
It also wouldn't solve the problem of having to change shitty software on every single fucking update.
>and we all use it
No, real devs don't, because it's dog shit.
But not surprising for a wanna-be "dev" that has no clue and has no job and all the time of the world.
https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/
Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity
We conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to understand how early-2025 AI tools affect the productivity of experienced open-source developers working on their own repositories. Surprisingly, we find that when developers use AI tools, they take 19% longer than without—AI makes them slower. We view this result as a snapshot of early-2025 AI capabilities in one relevant setting; as these systems continue to rapidly evolve, we plan on continuing to use this methodology to help estimate AI acceleration from AI R&D automation [1].