Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 12:38 p.m. No.24028006   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8028

>>24027838 (pb)

if you throw something heavier than air off a cliff it falls down, not up.

we have free will. We have gifts from God.

If we misuse them that's our fault not His.

That you don't understand is of no consequence.

you give what you get.

there are consequencea for sin,

and often it doesn't just effect the sinner but those around the sinner.

sad that you don't understand.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 12:40 p.m. No.24028009   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

โ–ถAnonymous (You) 12/25/25 (Thu) 15:14:18a47b76 (1) No.24027923

 

hello psyop jerks with you algebra of fake association:

I hope you repent from your blatant attempts to manipulate and confuse.

please find Jesus and follow him and

give up all your other causes.

Merry Christmas.

 

โ–ถAnonymous (You) 12/25/25 (Thu) 15:15:55a47b76 (2) No.24027928

 

>>24027918

 

how dare you use math to explain why so many people don't believe a thing that the zionists say anymore.

 

how dare you.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 1:32 p.m. No.24028126   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8131 >>8132 >>8137 >>8149

>>24028117

no one was ever a 'qanon'

it was a hashtag.

there was Q and there are anon.

anon often didn't agree with what Q said.

they didn't take him as gospel.

Q was Q and said what Q needed to say to message to operators in the field who would show up by posting in the bread around when Q would post, sometimes before as a kind of omen that Q was soon going to post.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 1:42 p.m. No.24028170   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8182 >>8191

>>24028149

a term is not a group of people.

once it was to be used as a pejorative and talking point, and was going to be used to censor people it made perfect sense to drop the use of the hashtag. Hence the dough images were changed to not include it.

 

but at no time was anyone here calling other people here 'qanon'. It might have been used to refer to the general phenomena of the posts and Q and the anon, but it was never a title to use on people except as a pejorative used by shills and haters of MAGA.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 1:50 p.m. No.24028202   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8213

>>24028193

>>24028193

you don't tell 'the Truth' you tell your slanted and personal misinterpretation of fragments of scripture.

you CONDEMN people in churches merely for being in churches and don't take each person as an individual.

that, to me, seems screwed up.

 

PS: calling people 'antiChrist' IS condemning them and casting a very hard judgement on them. That is NOT your role.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 2:06 p.m. No.24028274   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8298

>>24028213

you like conflict, you want others to be 'damned', it seems.

you use fightwords of harsh condemnation.

It doesn't seem to me that you are really that well versed in the Jesus Christ message despite being so well versed in those fragments that you've picked up, like sharp shards, that you try to use to make other Christians bleed and tell them that they aren't worthy enough.

but that's what we face, as Christians, attacks and condemnation and that you do it merely makes us stronger in the end to deal with your kind of onslaught.

you are very sure of yourself, almost prideful in your condemnation, and, yes, it is.

calling churches 'antiChrist' IS condemning them.

you know this and you pretend that you're just innocently quoting scriptures and have a 'did I do that' point of view.

you know exactly what you're doing and what the effect you want to have here in these breads, with people who at least want to be good Christians and follow Jesus Christ, even if they don't always get it right and even if they sometimes fall to sin.

you seem to enjoy the conflict and the condemnation and, no, you don't present 'Truth' but shards of scripture that you use to divide and to cut at the heart of others.

Anonymous ID: a47b76 Dec. 25, 2025, 2:17 p.m. No.24028323   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24028315

you too, conflict monger.

there is no madness here.

maybe sadness at you two trying to use scripture to cause fights and condemning others and then equivocating (pussying out) and denying that you meant it but 'The bible says'.

I have no more messaging for you today.