because the Ukrainigarchs decided to end it so that they could continue their long-plan to take over the whole world?
"Archbishop Henning to meet with Dedham priest over 'ICE was here' Nativity scene"
https://www.wcvb.com/article/archbishop-meeting-dedham-nativity/69863625
Southern California gets rain every so often.
and they need water.
So instead of building cistarns that are gigantic to allow them to fill up durring flooding . . . and provide an ample source of water, they let the flooding get insane, streets filled with water, houses washed away.
And then they cry 'boo hoo hoo, Federal government give us billions and billions' which the democrats probably pilfer.
The state is mismanaged and the flood control seems non existent.
it could be an amazing building program: cistarns.
and each one would fill up and then they could zone houses there, because they'd have enough water.
And the locals would control it, not the collectivists who fester in Sacramento.
It would drastically lower the costs of fire insurance. It would drastically lower the cost of water. It would reduce the flooding tremendously, and it would also be useful for growing crops or for irrigation. Imagine is Long Beach wasn't a cess pool but a wonderful river delta, filled with fish, a California Bayou! That's what is could be.
but instead we get what we have, a discusting cesspool and fetid water, and high costs, and very dangerous living conditions due to floods and fire.
The tell for an AI story on youtube is that they are usually about 20 minutes long.
So something showed up and I thought 'well, maybe this is worth watching'.
I didn't listen to it. It had the typical 'fake movie noise' thing, with lines that look like degraded film but that are repetitive and hypnotic. So I set the vid at double speed and turned on the closed caption, and scrolled down so that the image part was gone and read the monologue as closed caption.
It was one of those 'David and Goliath' type stories with virtuous famous singer pitted against a bad and broken mob boss . . .
very detailed, supposedly the mob boss dissed the singers mother . . .
well it just all seemed fake.
So today I decided 'let's find out if it's a real story or yet another fake click bait BS time wasting narrative.
and so I put the question to the Google AI.
The Google AI was quick to say 'most likely fake. Similar stories have popped up recently and quickly went viral'
20 minutes if you watched this stupid thing at regular speed and it's just a fake story!
I'd say that there ought to be a requirement to label such tripe as fiction.
>>24028925
actual physical eyes? like glass eyes?
she acquired them for you after someone gouged yours out because you were stoking them?
are they glass eyes? Did you get SSI for being blind?
if you're blond how do you know she's really blond? maybe she's not at the roots, you know.
>>24028939
she's probably using it to try and pull her hands out of the handcuffs he must have put on her to keep her from fleeing.
>>24028943
no worries.
I haven't been to California since 2014.
but there is SO MUCH potential, and so much fallow land. If they managed the water correctly it could be a paradise. Instead it's a hell hole of privilege. It's over priced and dangerous.
this 'confused about scripture' bots arguing with each other is a bit much.
can whoever is running this script just end it and start something else?
it's tedious and pointless.
loving people doesn't mean you have to have a relationship with them.
and, yes, two people who hate each other (grew to hate each other) are often stuck in a relationship.
agape love isn't eros.
loving and forgiving doesn't mean 'keeping house with and putting up with all their bad habits'
sometimes it means that you walk away because you realize that there is nothing you can do to help the person.
forgiving someone doesn't mean that the relationship that was magically returns.
Forgiveness isn't be a rube who lets the person get away with the same kind of bad behavior.
you can love a person and HATE being with them.
it's wanting what is best for them that is also holy.
not 'oh, we have chemistry and we feel'.
affection and love are NOT the same thing.
my point is that immature people who use 'feelings' to determine who they should or should not marry without regard for loving the person with agape love can choose someone who later on they find is actually quite incompatible. They have children and a 'relationship' even though they don't like each other, and the affection is gone.
but you like the terse one sentence post and to try to sound like you know stuff about relationships and love and 'what a neighbor' is, but in fact you just throw cold water on any arguement that anyone else makes. you aren't here to discuss deep issues about how to love our fellows. You are here to gainsay whatever else anyone comments.
you're not impressing anyone with this bit, anon.