oh, cuomo
this is excellent and pre-dates the current wave of attention
media/newfags:
where to begin:
https://qanon.pub/
the drops alone can get confusing at first.
the spreadsheet is a great help/tool:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M2AzhZKh2PjL7L7GVPN42Em0hZXKWMdhGnj59ZQ3YcQ/
there are many archive links in the bread (those repeated top posts that bakers provide), so you might find some you prefer.
welcome, and dig in.
it was surprising content to be deleted, in that it wasn't anything really new as such. Considering nothing is ever deleted and Q would know we would archive, i'll at least say it was posts about Steyer and Haiti, with one of his infamous "walnut" emails.
Considering how previous "blunders" from Q have shown to have multiple uses, seems pretty clear it was the case here.
But in deleted demand, Q explained it's mostly just timing, they'll come back to it in different order, so nothing should be missed
///
>>2403919 kek, made that one
>Q's posts, which can be found at qanon.pub, are more important than random Anon posts. This is mostly a chatroom where we look into news stories. What matters here is what we find, not what we say during the process of looking.
very well put
nope. anything you read in media doesn't cover a hundredth of what's actually to be found, and researched.
beware of any simple story. it's complicated, but the good kind of complicated. welcome. have fun…
but nothing beats just reading the drops themselves:
where to begin:
https://qanon.pub/
the drops alone can get confusing at first. for some events, you'll need context (abbreviations, cryptic posts, board migrations, etc)
the spreadsheet is a great help/tool:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M2AzhZKh2PjL7L7GVPN42Em0hZXKWMdhGnj59ZQ3YcQ/
there are many archive links in the bread (those repeated top posts that bakers provide), so you might find some you prefer.
welcome, and dig in.