https://web.archive.org/web/20251229120602/https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/how-one-man-stopped-the-electronic
George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal
How One Man Stopped The Electronic Lynching Of Candace Owens
By Exposing The Federal Informant Mitch Snow, The Planned Electronic Lynching Of Candace Owens Fizzled
Dec 28, 2025
PART I — Why Informants Change the Direction of Stories
I’ve been doing this long enough to know that the most powerful way to derail an investigation is not to stop it, but to redirect it. You don’t silence a journalist outright. You introduce a character. You add emotion. You complicate the timeline. You force the reporter to defend against a side story instead of advancing the main one.
Mitch Snow threatened to murder a Federal Judge, which is a felony. The only way he could not be in jail is if he became a Federal Informant.
That FBI tactic is not speculation; it’s documented. The New York Times has reported repeatedly on how intelligence and law-enforcement agencies have historically used informants not just to gather information, but to shape narratives and steer attention away from institutional exposure (New York Times, “The Informant Economy”:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/07/us/informants-law-enforcement.html).
The head of all DIA Informants, Brad Harsell, visited Ft Huachuca and took pictures with future DIA Informants at 11:47 AM in September 2025, just after a Live Exercise called “Backpack Bomber” was completed, where Mitch Snow played the role of “Backpack Bomber.
I have been questioning the use of Federal Informants to create fake False Flags and disrupt investigations since 2010 with my blog www.nomoreinformants.com. Here are a few New York Times articles on the subject. They are behind a paywall, be advised. This has nothing to do with me; rather, it is a decision by the New York Times editorial board.
1) “How the F.B.I. Teaches Informants to Snitch” (NYT)
You can find NYT reporting about similar topics on how the FBI handles and compensates informants here:
🔗 NYTimes search page for FBI informants / entrapment coverage:
https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=FBI+informants+entrapmen
📍 2) “The FBI’s Informant Problem” (NYT, 2019-style framing)
There is NYT reporting in 2019 and surrounding years on how the FBI uses and relies on informants, often in terrorism and domestic security cases.
🔗 3). NYTimes search for “FBI informant problem”:
https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=FBI+informant+problem
This search will show articles like “F.B.I. Struggling With Informant Oversight” or “FBI relied on paid sources in terrorism sting cases” — the ones people reference as part of the “informant economy” theme.
Here is a similar article behind a paywall in the Intercept.
4) “How the FBI Created a Terrorist”
This is an article by The Intercept (not the NYT) by Trevor Aaronson that’s widely referenced in discussions about FBI informant-led sting operations.
https://trial-and-terror.theintercept.com/howthefbicreatedaterrorist/
George Webb’s Task Force Orange Journal is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
That context matters here, because what I observed was not the collapse of an investigation — it was its diversion.
Candace Owens was not originally investigating an individual. She was investigating institutions, money, and power. Specifically, she was circling two unresolved questions tied to the final days of Charlie Kirk’s life: his stated desire for a DOJ audit of Turning Point USA, and reports that a powerful industrial figure had made a last-minute financial overture to him.
Then, abruptly, the story changed.
PART II — The Moment the Charlie Kirk Questions Went Quiet
Journalists know the sound of a story losing oxygen. It doesn’t vanish; it just stops moving forward. Questions that were being sharpened suddenly aren’t asked anymore. Sources dry up. Attention shifts.
this is the STORY of 8KUN AS WELL