why show this guy?
He's so last century.
his influence is voided by his well known . . . character.
why show this guy?
He's so last century.
his influence is voided by his well known . . . character.
>>24048833
you self mock thus you must not exist.
sorry, anon, your projecting.
you're hung up on a very flawed and broken man who wasn't the sage that they MSM pretended he was. He had a lot of extreme issues, and he wasn't really that nice to the people around him.
and it's 47 or so years since he passed and you still haven't figured out : he wasn't all that.
he was a human, flawed, and not really that mystical or even very interesting if you spent the time to read through what he did.
yes, he was in a band that was very popular, that's true. And by now you should have been able to figure out: he was a pawn in someone else's psyop, a victim himself, and not really that nice a guy. I feel sorry for him but I DO NOT idolize him nor take his opinions about stuff to be anything more than him just commenting on whatever was happenind around him at the time. He certainly didn't have a philosophy that was worth following.
He was a show man who pretended to be sage like and then realized he's been made to play a role and tried to rebell from that.
He wasn't who you think he is, anon.
and after all this time you should be over it, instead of denigrating those who tell you "grow up, don't idolize these antique rock stars who have been dead for decades"
you should snap out of your fan-boy behavior and just look at him as yet another actor/ musician who was playing a role.
After you read just don't make a pilgrimage to Plainfield, New Hampshire, 'kay?