Yes he would.
Biden was never “really” president.
250 years.
——————
number 250 in the Bible primarily refers to the 250 leaders who joined Korah's rebellion against Moses and Aaron in Numbers 16, challenging their authority, resulting in divine judgment where fire consumed them, and the earth swallowed Korah and his followers, symbolizing serious consequences for opposing God's appointed leadership. It highlights themes of authority, rebellion, and judgment within the Israelite community, and appears in counts related to Levitical service or prophetic visions, though less symbolically than other numbers.
Key Biblical References to 250
Korah's Rebellion (Numbers 16): This is the most famous instance, where 250 prominent Israelite leaders, "men of renown," joined Korah in questioning Moses and Aaron's leadership, leading to their destruction by God as a warning against challenging divine order.
Levitical Service: While 25 is the age for service, the number 250 appears in organizational contexts or prophetic visions, like those of Ezekiel, showing specific numbers of men associated with temple duties or symbolic spiritual acts, some positive, some negative (e.g., worshipping the sun).
Linguistic Significance: The Greek word meaning "to answer" or "to begin to speak" (Strong's G611, apokrinomai) appears 250 times in the New Testament, notably in the Gospels, linking the number to communication and response in a spiritual context.
Symbolism and Themes
Challenge to Authority: The 250 leaders represent significant, yet misguided, opposition to God's chosen leaders.
Divine Judgment: Their fate underscores God's intolerance for rebellion and pride.
Leadership & Service: The number can also relate to roles within religious service, highlighting structure and responsibility.
Hmmmmm
Quite dasting to ponder this supernaturally in relation to all goings on.
Again I say….Hmmmmm
I like the idea, BUT….
Would not affect liberal un- married women, so it is a flaw. Would affect more-so married conservatives.
AI Overview
+18
The women's right to vote, established by the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, cannot be easily repealed. Amending the U.S. Constitution is a difficult, multi-step process, and there is no viable path for repealing it at this time.
The Process for Repeal
A constitutional amendment, like the 19th Amendment, can only be overturned by the ratification of another constitutional amendment. The process for passing a new amendment, as outlined in Article V of the Constitution, requires broad bipartisan and interstate consensus:
Proposal: A proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority vote in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.
Ratification: After passing Congress, the amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of the current 50 states).
Given that women make up a significant portion of the electorate and consistently vote at higher rates than men, gathering the political will to repeal their right to vote is considered impossible in the current political landscape.
Current Challenges to Voting Access
While a full repeal of the 19th Amendment is not a realistic possibility, some groups have advocated for the idea on social media and in right-wing media circles.
More practical challenges to women's voting access come in the form of voting regulations that disproportionately impact women and other marginalized communities. For example, the proposed "SAVE Act" (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) in Congress has raised concerns from voting rights groups. This bill would require voters to present a birth certificate or passport for registration, which could disenfranchise an estimated 69 million American women (about one-fourth of eligible voters) who have changed their names after marriage and whose birth certificates do not match their current legal names.
Efforts to restrict voting access continue to be challenged in state legislatures and courts by organizations like the Brennan Center for Justice and the League of Women Voters.
—————
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/why-voting-rights-groups-warn-the-save-act-may-make-it-harder-for-married-women-to-vote
The bill would require an individual to present in person a passport, birth certificate or other citizenship document when registering to vote or updating their voter registration information.
Voting rights groups have said the bill will pose a barrier for millions of American women and others who have changed their legal name because of marriage, assimilation or to better align with their gender identity. An estimated 69 million American women and 4 million men do not have a birth certificate that matches their current legal name.
Republicans who support the bill claim that states will be able to create processes so people can prove their citizenship if their name doesn't match their birth certificate.
Voting rights groups also worry the bill will disenfranchise others from marginalized communities who are less likely to have the necessary documentation on hand. More than 9 percent of citizens of voting age — or 21.3 million people — do not have documents that prove their citizenship readily available.
They also warn the bill, if it becomes law, would eliminate popular methods of voter registration, such as online, mail and registration drives — adding demands on a women-led election workforce that has faced burnout and harassment after years of disinformation about election integrity.
I like this
> also warn the bill, if it becomes law, would eliminate popular methods of voter registration, such as online, mail and registration drives —
What is this?
< Jamala(K!)
I know he means Kamal, but why the
Jamala(K!)
What does that imply ?
Exclamation point and all?
Lot’s of stuff IS real but not widely accepted.
>>24053825 faggot-
Example:
"Q" in the Bible refers primarily to the hypothetical "Quelle" (German for "source"), a lost collection of Jesus' sayings used by the Gospel writers Matthew and Luke, explaining the parallel material in their Gospels not found in Mark. It's a cornerstone of the Two-Source Hypothesis in biblical scholarship, proposing Matthew and Luke drew from Mark and this sayings source. There's also a website, qBible.com, offering free Bible study resources.
The Q Source (Quelle)
What it is: A theorized ancient document containing sayings (logia) of Jesus, not narrative stories, which Matthew and Luke used independently.
Why scholars believe in it: To explain the roughly 235 verses shared by Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark, suggesting a common source beyond Mark.
Contents: Includes the Beatitudes, Lord's Prayer, temptations in the wilderness, and commands about enemies/judging.
Nature: Believed to be a sayings gospel, similar in genre to the non-canonical Gospel of Thomas, with no passion narrative.
Status: No physical copy exists, but its existence is a key part of modern gospel scholarship, though some scholars debate its exact nature.
qBible.com
What it is: A free online library for biblical research, providing various Bible versions, lexicons, and study tools.
Other "Q" references
Biblical names starting with Q, like Quartus or Quirinius, are rare but exist.
Where “deliveries” arrive daily without questions.
Zactly
>>24053853
“Dollar”. “General”
Is COMMS
> I found out what it is that's been driving me mad
There's no room to breathe between the good and the bad
A crush in-between, there's a thin, thin line
But just 'round the corner, there's a change in design
I wish I could walk away
And dig what the preachers say
But those words don't satisfy me no more
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world
Just fifty more years, we're all gonna know
Why, when, where, how, and who gets to go
So let's all have a good time before the great divide
'Cause things will start separating come 2025
So look for the subtle clues
It won't make the front-page news
That depends upon which side that you choose
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world, yeah
There's a crack
There's a crack in the world
https://youtu.be/gKcjCU48Swo
>>24053919 from 1977
——
The phrase "Crack in the World" most famously refers to a song by Sammy Hagar from his album Musical Chairs, released in 1977, which gained recent attention for its lyrics predicting a societal divide around the year 2025. Alternatively, it could refer to the 1965 sci-fi film Crack in the World, about a nuclear experiment gone wrong, which premiered in February 1965.
If you mean the song by Sammy Hagar:
Written: 1977.
Album: Musical Chairs.
Noteworthy: The song's lyrics mention a "great divide" happening in 2025, leading to recent online discussions about its prophetic nature, notes this Reddit thread and this Facebook post.
If you mean the movie:
Released: February 24, 1965 (U.S.).
Plot: Scientists accidentally create a massive rift in the Earth's crust, threatening to split the planet.
https://youtu.be/LZ7s3hpE-_I
Hmmmm
The title has 17 in it.
Crack in the World (1965):
17 Terrifying End-of-the-World Secrets
1,710 views · 1 month ago
+2
Project Mohole: The U.S. Attempt to Drill the World's Deepest Hole
"Project Mohole" was a groundbreaking 1950s/60s scientific endeavor (1958-1967) by American scientists to drill through the Earth's oceanic crust to reach the mantle, the layer beneath it, by drilling deep below the seafloor, a massive undertaking that developed new deep-sea drilling technologies like dynamic positioning, even though the ultimate goal wasn't met, paving the way for modern oceanography.
Key Aspects:
Goal: To obtain samples of the Earth's mantle (the Mohorovičić discontinuity, or "Moho") by drilling through the crust.
Initiation: Started under the American Miscellaneous Society (AMSOC) with key figures from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography like Walter Munk and Roger Revelle.
Technology: Developed crucial deep-sea drilling innovations, including dynamic positioning, to keep ships steady over drilling sites in deep water.
First Attempts (Early 1960s): Used the converted drilling ship CUSS I to drill off Mexico, successfully penetrating oceanic crust and sediment layers.
Legacy: Though it didn't reach the mantle, it proved deep-ocean drilling was possible, gathered significant data, and laid the foundation for future scientific ocean drilling programs.
In essence, Project Mohole was humanity's ambitious first step in trying to touch the Earth's mantle from the ocean floor, leading to major scientific and technological advancements in ocean drilling.
https://library.ucsd.edu/speccoll/findingaids/sac0011.html
Mohole Project Records, 1943, 1958-1967 (SAC 11)
OFF-SITE STORAGE: COLLECTION STORED OFF-SITE. ALLOW TWO TO THREE (2-3) WEEKS FOR RETRIEVAL OF MATERIALS.
Extent: 11.6 Linear feet (29 archives boxes)
Abstract
Administrative History
Scope and Content of Collection
This collection documents the operations of Project Mohole from its inception in 1958 to its termination in 1967. The majority of the collection consists of progress reports to the NSF from the primary contractor Brown & Root with updates on technological developments in areas of drilling, naval architecture, logistics, geology, seismology, bathymetry, instrumentation design, site survey, and land- and sea-based experimental drill holes. A master index exists for navigating these Progress and Technical Reports.
The remaining collection consists of administrative materials discussing AMSOC's inception of the Mohole project, early planning meetings, the process of site selection, contractor selection, discussion on the nature of and need for an "intermediate" stage, the evolving duties of AMSOC, LOCO, and CORE in Mohole activities, and congressional inquiry into Mohole spending. Committee scientists also kept extensive research files on contemporary Soviet drilling projects. The collection contains two artificial files by SIO archivists on project chronologies and bibliographies, consisting of selected AMSOC memoranda, correspondence, and documents, including a 1943 proposal "Core Drilling Under the Oceans" from Thomas Jaggar to the International Union for Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG).
The collection is arranged into five series: 1) COMMITTEES, 2) CORRESPONDENCE, 3) CONTRACTORS, 4) RESEARCH FILES, 5) PRESS COVERAGE.
> Elephant gives birth to a midget
https://www.tiktok.com/@fatstimbo/video/7175284881134505221?lang=en