Habby New To You Anon Fren
o7
14KB-New-years-eve-fireworks.gif
may the new year bring you prosperity and health.
Cheers and pull up your boot straps… it's gonna get real in the coming days.
May the Lord Bless you and yours in the new year..
Happy New Year Frens, Anons, Shills, one and all!
while i agree that is morally disgusting, two to the … and one to the … does not compute as a righteous finding.
NOT a PUSSIE jus a belebber in jesus christ, one who thinks that all should repent and come to knowledge of the saving grace Of Almighty God & His Son Jesus Christ.
jus sayin is all..
this is news
https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2025/12/31/judge-dugan-could-be-impeached-before-she-gets-sentenced-n3810384
Judge Dugan Could Be Impeached Before She Gets Sentenced
Judge Hannah Dugan was convicted nearly two weeks ago of one felony count of obstruction. As I said at the time, it seemed pretty clear that the failure to get a conviction on the other misdemeanor count had everything to do with the judge's instructions to the jury.
As the jury deliberated, a question came out: Did Dugan need to know the identity of the man immigration agents were seeking to be found guilty of concealing him?
Adelman responded: Yes, she did. The jury voted to acquit on that count…
As jurors munched on pizza, another question came out. It was the same question as the first: Did Dugan need to know the suspect's identity to be guilty of count two?
But this time, the answer was different, more vague.
And the jury found Dugan guilty on count two.
In any case, what usually happens after a conviction is that the judge sets a date for sentencing. But so far, Judge Adelman hasn't done that in Dugan's case, which is unusual.
U.S. Judge Lynn Adelman has not set a sentencing date or ordered a pre-sentence investigation. A PSI is deep background check by a federal probation officer with details of the crime, defendant's criminal history and personal life and any victim impact to help the judge give a fair sentence.
It is unusual for a judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin not to immediately order a PSI and set a sentencing date after a jury returns a guilty verdict.
After Adelman read the verdict on Dec. 18, Dugan's defense team said they would ask him to overturn the verdict.
The grounds for such a post-conviction motion have not been laid out, but the team has indicated it will argue that the answers Adelman gave to jury instructions were unclear and possibly improper. Judicial immunity is likely to come back as an argument, they said.
Is the fact that Adelman didn't set a sentencing date indicate he will overturn the jury's verdict? Too early to say, but it seems safe to say he is taking the motion seriously. A decision won't come until March.
So the appeal of the verdict will be decided in March and then, either way, the case will likely be appealed again to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. And if Judge Adelman hasn't felt the need to hold a sentencing before the first appeal he may not hold it before the next appeal either, which could take months.
Meanwhile, Republicans are working to impeach Judge Dugan as soon as next month.
moar at link