Anonymous ID: 6c760d Jan. 2, 2026, 8:43 a.m. No.24061107   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1136 >>1143 >>1154 >>1167 >>1211 >>1224 >>1254 >>1277 >>1313 >>1351 >>1408 >>1514

>>24058183 pb

Forgot to mention, regarding this ^

The attack at the Pentagon on Sept 11th 2001 involved the "projectile" "plane" or whatever it was, coming in at horizontal to the ground level.

Several objections were made about this (objections regarding rules of Nature and how they could not jive with the dramatic narrative propagated)

  1. An aircraft can not fly that close to the ground. There will be no lift.

  2. If their story was right, the alleged plane would have been tipped as it arrived.

 

Per the answer of Q, whoever that is, in the Q an A regarding. "

"Did a plane hit the Pentagon"

Answer "Yes"

Why is the answer correct? How does it resolve with the footage I'm showing right here? vidrel

The plane was a fly over and the Pentagon was hit with a missile.

 

We'll leave out the fact there was no aircraft debris at the sight and that the hole in the side of the Pentagon was perfectly round and small, consistent with a missile strike.

(Some shill back in the day, claimed the plane folded itself up so it could get inside, No kidding.)

 

Some people claim they say the plane hit.

But we know they did not.

Why?

Because no such thing happened.

It's part of how the con works.

They place an idea in your mind, suggestion, and you yourself make it real.

Much like "Bad Man Red Man" Trump.

There's no actual evidence, but they plant the seed, keep repeating, and you create the reality in your own mind.

That is very powerful. More powerful probably than showing real evidence (though there isn't any against Trump) keke

 

Check the vidrel for the sauce photographic evidence. It was found in a "time capsule" so to speak, recently. The copy is very clear, taken right off a public network broadcast in 2005.

There's more to say, obviously. I'm naturally long winded. I've put bits and pieces up here for years. Hopefully some have saved it off line.

I can't do everything! We're a team.

 

>>24059330 lb

>>24058669 lb

>>24058460 lb

>>24058333 lb

It's a long subject.

but just to be short about it,

The vids show the "plane" coming in flat. (this I was writing of the vids of the NYC attack)

There's one vid that shows it divebombing. (not an actual divebomb,more like a gradual 45 -ish degree descent (or less) as opposed to 180 degree, goes straight in)

You have to understand, and most people don't, That all the images except for the Naudet vid (alleged film of the hit on the North Tower from the North side) are exclusively of the South Tower, with object coming from the South.

All other depictions, beside the Naudet, are of the South Tower hit.

 

>>24058683 lb

Anonymous ID: 6c760d Jan. 2, 2026, 8:50 a.m. No.24061136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1143 >>1154 >>1167 >>1211 >>1224 >>1254 >>1277 >>1313 >>1351 >>1408 >>1514

>>24061107

Some people claim they saw the plane hit.

 

Though there was an on the ground announcer at the time, who said there was not one sign of an aircraft hitting.

He was soon "straightened out"

 

We'll leave out the fact there was no aircraft debris at the site.

 

But see for yourself with this authentic and very clear footage.

Locked up for twenty years.

Check the first screen for verification as to when it was broadcast.

Anonymous ID: 6c760d Jan. 2, 2026, 9:10 a.m. No.24061254   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1276 >>1277 >>1313 >>1351 >>1408 >>1514

>>24061224

>>24061211

>>24061167

>>24061154

>>24061143

>>24061136

>>24061107

 

Q team whoever they are. (including likely q+ ?) have told us, almost promised, this is not forgotten.

 

Who are the present day perps who were also in on this?

Brennan and Comey?

 

picrel

This is the scale of it, (aircraft / Pentagon scale comparison), had it actually have been a passenger aircraft on site.