Godspeed, Baker!
>Congress gonna be pissed
'Not only has the President the authority to use the armed forces in carrying out the broad foreign policy of the United States implementing treaties, but it is equally clear that this authority may not be interfered with by the Congress in the exercise of powers which it has under the Constitution.
President Truman did not seek congressional authorization before sending troops to Korea, and subsequent Presidents similarly acted on their own in putting troops into many foreign countries, including the Dominican Republic, Lebanon, and most notably Indochina. Eventually, public opposition precipitated another constitutional debate whether the President had the authority to commit troops to foreign combat without the approval of Congress, culminating in the enactment of the War Powers Resolution. The Resolution did little to inhibit Presidents from sending troops abroad without prior congressional authorization, and the Supreme Court has not squarely addressed the issue.'
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-1-10/ALDE_00013472/
>>>24067280, >>24067299, >>24067317, >>24067325 first arrest will shock the world & direction of where things will be going
Baker, the use of the phrase 'first arrest will shock the world' in our Notables embarrasses the legacy of /qresearch.
>"When I see the behaviour of the protestors [in Iran], and the material coming out looks well-produced, this means they likely received guidance (from Mossad). There is no way this is all natural."
Blackmail - i.e. owning all of the files and evidence from the Maxwell/Epstein Kompromat Operation - could persuade even Mossad to cooperate and liberate Iran.