Anonymous ID: 9dc384 Aug. 1, 2018, 11:11 p.m. No.2407202   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7216 >>7268

BBC accused of ‘breaching code’ by putting Assange critic in charge of special on WikiLeaks founder

Published time: 1 Aug, 2018 17:20

 

BBC’s Newsnight will air a special on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange hosted by journalist John Sweeney, despite what the #FreeAssange campaign say are tweets in “clear breach” of the BBC objectivity standards by the journalist.

“John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code,” the #FreeAssange campaign tweeted.

 

#FreeAssange! (tweets by campaign)⌛

@JulianAssange

BBC Newsnight's John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code: https://twitter.com/i/moments/1024359542304505856 …

 

6:51 PM - Jul 31, 2018

Embedded image permalink

BBC Newsnight's Sweeney given Assange special despite malicious tweets

#FreeAssange! (tweets by campaign)⌛ @JulianAssange

Just hours after BBC Newsnight's John Sweeney tweeted derogatory falsehoods about Assange, the BB

 

BBC’s Newsnight will air a special on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange hosted by journalist John Sweeney, despite what the #FreeAssange campaign say are tweets in “clear breach” of the BBC objectivity standards by the journalist.

“John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code,” the #FreeAssange campaign tweeted.

 

#FreeAssange! (tweets by campaign)⌛

@JulianAssange

BBC Newsnight's John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code: https://twitter.com/i/moments/1024359542304505856 …

 

6:51 PM - Jul 31, 2018

Embedded image permalink

BBC Newsnight's Sweeney given Assange special despite malicious tweets

#FreeAssange! (tweets by campaign)⌛ @JulianAssange

Just hours after BBC Newsnight's John Sweeney tweeted derogatory falsehoods about Assange, the BB

 

BBC’s Newsnight will air a special on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange hosted by journalist John Sweeney, despite what the #FreeAssange campaign say are tweets in “clear breach” of the BBC objectivity standards by the journalist.

“John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code,” the #FreeAssange campaign tweeted.

 

#FreeAssange! (tweets by campaign)⌛

@JulianAssange

BBC Newsnight's John Sweeney put in charge of tomorrow's Julian Assange special despite (because of?) malicious tweets in clear breach of BBC code:

 

John Sweeney

✔

@johnsweeneyroar

A great insight into Putin's most unaware useful idiot, Julian Assange. Comic on Russian democracy https://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2016/12/23/news/assange_wikileaks-154754000/ … via @repubblicait

 

5:34 AM - Dec 28, 2016

John Sweeney

✔

@johnsweeneyroar

Replying to @abbydees

Julian Assange is the Prisoner of Knightsbridge. It's a yet to be made film about a Russian agent holed up in London's fancy area @abbydees

 

12:27 PM - Mar 9, 2017

 

Assange has been living inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London for six years and fears extradition to the United States over millions of leaked documents and classified US military footage. Recent reports have suggested that due to his deteriorating health, Assange may be leaving the embassy soon.

 

The Courage Foundation, which fundraises for the legal defense of whistleblowers, said the conditions in which Assange is living with “no access to sunlight” are having a serious impact on his “physical and mental health”.

 

Sweeney has a history of making his personal feelings about various political figures clear. A look at his Twitter profile shows that he has also retweeted numerous comments highly critical of UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, and that he appears to have somewhat of a fixation with Russia.

 

Sweeney made headlines in 2014 for “doorstepping” Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow to ask him whether he “regrets the killings in Ukraine”. Putin stopped to answer the question through a translator.

 

An article in the UK’s Independent newspaper at the time said that Sweeney had “a reputation for sailing close to the wind”.

 

Assange’s mother, Christine Assange, tweeted that her son is “sick, in pain & suffering” and labelled BBC journalists involved with the special “career building cowards” who want to “kick him when he's down”.

READ MORE: https://www.rt.com/uk/434862-assange-john-sweeney-bbc/

Anonymous ID: 9dc384 Aug. 1, 2018, 11:41 p.m. No.2407496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7591

NATO: Time To Re-Examine An Alliance

 

08/02/2018 - 02:00

 

Authored by Conn Hallinan via Dispatches From The Edge blog,

 

The outcome of the July11-12 NATO meeting in Brussels got lost amid the media’s obsession with President Donald Trump’s bombast, but the “Summit Declaration” makes for sober reading. The media reported that the 28-page document “upgraded military readiness,” and was “harshly critical of Russia,” but there was not much detail beyond that.

 

But details matter, because that is where the Devil hides.

 

One such detail is NATO’s “Readiness Initiative” that will beef up naval, air and ground forces in “the eastern portion of the Alliance.” NATO is moving to base troops in Latvia, Estonia Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Poland. Since Georgia and Ukraine have been invited to join the Alliance, some of those forces could end up deployed on Moscow’s western and southern borders.

 

And that should give us pause.

 

A recent European Leadership’s Network’s (ELN) study titled “Envisioning a Russia-NATO Conflict” concludes, “The current Russia-NATO deterrence relationship is unstable and dangerously so.” The ELN is an independent think tank of military, diplomatic and political leaders that fosters “collaborative” solutions to defense and security issues.

 

High on the study’s list of dangers is “inadvertent conflict,” which ELN concludes “may be the most likely scenario for a breakout” of hostilities. “The close proximity of Russian and NATO forces” is a major concern, argues the study, “but also the fact that Russia and NATO have been adapting their military postures towards early reaction, thus making rapid escalation more likely to happen.”

 

With armed forces nose-to-nose, “a passage from crisis to conflict might be sparked by the actions of regional commanders or military commanders at local levels or come as a consequence of an unexpected incident or accident.” According to the European Leadership Council, there have been more than 60 such incidents in the last year.

 

The NATO document is, indeed, hard on Russia, which it blasts for the “illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea,” its “provocative military activities, including near NATO borders,” and its “significant investments in the modernization of its strategic [nuclear] forces.”

 

Unpacking all that requires a little history, not the media’s strong suit.

 

The story goes back more than three decades to the fall of the Berlin Wall and eventual re-unification of Germany. At the time, the Soviet Union had some 380,000 troops in what was then the German Democratic Republic. Those forces were there as part of the treaty ending World War II, and the Soviets were concerned that removing them could end up threatening the USSR’s borders. The Russians have been invaded—at terrible cost—three times in a little more than a century.

 

So West German Chancellor Helmet Kohl, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker, and Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev cut a deal. The Soviets agreed to withdraw troops from Eastern Europe as long as NATO did not fill the vacuum, or recruit members of the Soviet-dominated Warsaw Pact. Baker promised Gorbachev that NATO would not move “one inch east.”

 

The agreement was never written down, but it was followed in practice. NATO stayed west of the Oder and Neisse rivers, and Soviet troops returned to Russia. The Warsaw Pact was dissolved in 1991

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-01/nato-time-re-examine-alliance