>>24075571

please forgibs my dumb

What is the "YT" mean?

>>24075571

"Follow the wives"

is that like "the wives" of demons?

>>24075646

>>24075676

I know the youtube is dirty, but that doesn't really fit the context of that. maybe something else

>>24075571

All three judges (liberal white women) acquit the fraud scum even after juries unanimous finding of guilt.

Historically that is very rare in Law (because it is defiance by the Judge against the Jury, very fucking bad) and only showed up in extremely odd cases, yet this case is very simple… but this is a statistical cluster that should be noticed all across America!.

I still don't understand what the "YT" is suggesting.

>>24075714

ok,

that makes better sense,

it is just so delicate to say that specifically???

>>24075712

>>24075571

Please forgive my unfounded assumption…

I can see they are white,

they look like women,

but i do not know if they are actually "liberals".

Do any or all of those things have bearing in this case? Obviously it is a stereotype (and stereotypes DO exist for reasons), but is the general public still not allowed to notice the pattern?

or does the "YT" refer to something else?

>>24075657

I do agree that their ACTIONS are inhuman,

but no, i can not see that clearly in their pictures

is there something characteristic you can see??

>>24076132

Debated this subject all morning at breakfast diner.

Is it boiled down to 'liberal white women', or is there some other more substantive common denominator between the three judges, plus the other judge who snuck the illegal out the back door, and the gibbens lady running Public Assistance, plus the Housing Czar in NY City, plus Killery Clinton, all the Karens running HOAs… on and on and on????

If this whole mess boils down to just that demographic, i don't think it has enough traction. Is there some other link to show blackmail, or communication, or manipulation of that particular demographic???