Anonymous ID: 5e8fa0 Aug. 2, 2018, 12:03 a.m. No.2407682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7684 >>7744 >>7832 >>7941

>>2407655

>Itโ€™s possible our beloved President may in fact have to publicly disavow Q.

 

Sarah Sanders didn't exactly give an endorsement this afternoon when she was asked about Q.

Sounded like she was equating this board with violent fringe groups.

I think she had a prepared answer and flubbed it.

She needs to clarify that, imo.

Anonymous ID: 5e8fa0 Aug. 2, 2018, 12:30 a.m. No.2407917   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7953

>>2407870

>who can't appreciate the subtlety.

 

I'm not her audience, shithead.

Normies are.

She needed to separate "violent fringe groups" from this board.

It's not end of the world shit, but it was a flub.

You're a fucking idiot sheep who can't call out a mistake by your own team.

Anonymous ID: 5e8fa0 Aug. 2, 2018, 12:46 a.m. No.2408078   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8085

>>2407847

>False โ€˜violentโ€™ narrative push.

>Ask yourself, why?

 

False Flag coming. To be blamed on "fringe groups tied to Q anon conspiracy."

Looking to shut it down "for our the safety of the media/politicians/minorities/etc."

IOW, same old bullshit they use to grab freedoms from Americans.