a journalist's lifeblood is proof.
if they offer up a story they can't back up with credible evidence, they can get sued to oblivion.
if their editor says that a story isn't qualified to run, they can quit or run something else.
i am convinced that there are many journalists who WANT to report on this, but cannot because they don't have the proof, or it isn't properly sourced. YET.
i have spoken with three on an anon-personal level now, and 2 of them want to print something specific, but don't have good sources, and the 3rd is waiting for someone else to break the seal.
it will come, the pressure is on. as they report this as a fringe group, or deranged, that only brings attention. attention brings debate, debate brings truth.