>>2407682

Gtfo with this shit.

Sarah Sanders dodged a loaded question with impressive ability while at the same time reinforcing POTUS position on violent groups like Antifa.

She wasn't just "asked about q", she was asked about "fringe groups" like qanon.

If anything the fact that "qanon" didn't come out of her mouth in that answer is an indirect endorsement. Do you think she has hesitated to say "antifa" before? It means she had a conversation with someone to dodge that question. She knows that when the time is right POTUS will answer THE Q.

>>2407750

Pre-meditated and coordinated I'd say

>>2407744

For logic fags out there this is called "poisoning the well".

When the question contains therein a comparison attempting to influence the perception of the answer before it's given.

learn politics

>>2407817

No flub, just an anon who can't appreciate the subtlety.

Go read faggot.

>>2407847

They scared and running for cover. So stupid, blowing it up so much. They must think no one has a brain.

Ask anyone if they've ever seen the media attack any president as much as Trump and they'll admit something is up. Just the same thing over again.

>>2407934

Not necessarily, someone above them is though.

>>2407917

>She needed to separate "violent fringe groups" from this board.

Nobody ever mentioned this board in that press conference.

shills gunna shill, filtered

>>2407947

Really nice explanation, thumbs up anon.

> One easy way to beat it is to restate the question i your words, or make them "restate the question.

I like to call this, reframing the room to your frame of mind, instead of adopting the frame of mind presented. There is a psychological element to it.

>>2407983

>The MSM is not smart enough to maintain this balance without shitting the bed and destroying themselves.

Especially when everyone already knows the press is full of shit, and eating it too.

>>2407898

Excellently said anon.

They're kicking the dog and calling us dog kickers.