Good think protesting isn't obstructing but a constitutionally protected right.
*thing
>if the goverment protects free speech
Government violates free speech all the time. You qualified it with "POTUS".
Who gave government courts authority to gag speech?
Courts issue gag orders all the time, even against Trump. That is a violation of free speech.
Who told you I'm a leftist?
Who gave them that authority?
I have the right to say what the fuck I want when I want, and no court was given authority to "RULE" that I not say it.
They limit free speech every day.
Any law repugnant to the constitution is void, and anyone who deprives a right under color of law, even a law "on the books" has committed a crime.
So tell me, in a nation with a constitution that guarantees your right to free speech… Who EXACTLY gave judges authority to issue a so called "gag order"?
You keep pulling labels out of your ass and "attaching" them to me.
You didn't answer the question.
It's the courts and law enforcement who believe themselves above the law. You know, "Immunity".
Why do you keep saying "Trumps government" qualifying it as Trumps. It's government, and yes I have, the courts unconstitutionally issue "gag orders" and those unconstitutional orders are enforced. That happens under Trump and it happened other others.
*under others
When did I say laws and rules don't apply to me? I'm saying the courts are violating the law. BIG difference.
The US government is lawless, the Supreme Court is lawless
You ignore what you don't want to hear.
Why do you misquote Jesus?
Mark 10:17-18
>As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
>“Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.
Matthew 23:8
“But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi, (which means teacher)’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers.
John 10:11-18
>“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
I never called Trump a dictator.
I never said anything about Covid…. which was an op by the way.
I said government violates free speech, both with and without Trump.
Notice you don't ACTUALLY care about free speech, only your argument.
Again, why do you keep calling it Trumps? It's just government, and yes they do it every time a gag order is issued. You have yet to tell me who gave them that authority, and don't say "the law" because the 1st amendment is the actual law. Congress can pass no law infringing freedom of speech, and judges have no law authorizing gag orders.
You don't actually care about freedom of speech, only the narrative you're pushing.
>https://biblehub.com/mark/10-18.htm
They don't disagree. Jesus was talking about Good TEACHER.
As He said, He is the good shepherd.
A government operation.
I have, repeatedly, you just don't like the answer. Where did the courts get the authority? You don't answer because you can't.
Even AI is calling them the standing army.
>and where the state is unable,fails, or refusesto protect said rights (§ 253)
Like open carry
You keep thinking I'm against Trump KMAO
I've answered your other question, you refuse to answer mine.
I think government did it. I told you that repeatedly.
It wasn't an attack, it was a test.
You're quite delusional kek
Gee I wonder why.
Gun control, civil asset forfeiture, prior restraint, demanding ID without PC or RAS of a crime, arrested for "taking our attention" for verbally opposing and challenging police, which the US Supreme Court was VERY clear could not be interference back in 1987, people being trespassed from public meetings and forcibly removed or arrested for "disparaging remarks" calling out governments crimes, innocent people being abused or even killed…and those responsible still believe themselves great defenders of liberty.
I don't agree with attacking police, that's stupid. I do however agree with people defending themselves from police acting outside the law…. which is their right, and think it should happen much more often.
Stop projecting nonsense onto me.
Read Bad Elk . US, the 4th, 9th, and 14th amendments to the US Constitution.
The people have the unalienable right to use force against an unlawful arrest, and no matter how much they now claim it's "bad law" it's still a right retained and reserved by the people.
*Bad Elk v. US
We the People retain and reserve our rights, the US Constitution limits government and protects those rights, even unenumerated rights.
Those who conspire against our rights are enemies to the Constitution of the United States and should be treated as such.
Translation: Nope.
If you did, you'd speak the fuck up about ALL the constitutional violations occurring regularly.
Where did I do that?
Double team? KMAO
You're accusing me of shit and can't even keep track who you're talking to.
More projection of nonsense.
I simply asked if you respect the constitution and rule of law. I find those who accuse others of not often do not themselves, they see it only as something to accuse the "other side" of.
So… do you respect the constitution and rule of law? Are you against ALL violations of it, no matter which "side"?